Hi Chuck, On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
I do not believe your assessment is correct Avri. My understanding is that Kristina communicated that the CSG supported seating Terry in the Non-Contracted Party House but I will let her speak for herself. Regarding the RySG, I sent an email supporting that as well.
Like I guess Avri I must have missed your message, when did you send it? Either way, how would two of four SGs be sufficient? Bill
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:26 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
Hi,
Because the motion the council passed required that the 4 SG in consensus through their reps either agree to the NCA recommendations or come up with another plan.
As far as I can tell only the CSG agreed with the NCA recommendations and there was no consensus on another plan by 7 Oct, hence we fall through to the random selection.
a.
On 8 Oct 2009, at 10:11, Philip Sheppard wrote:
Avri,
I believe a preference has been expressed for Terry and the
NCP House.
Why is this being ignored ? Philip
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html ***********************************************************