Oct. 2, 2009
4:11 p.m.
Hi, No agreement that I remember. There was a discussion that it might not be needed. Then there was a realization that we would be receiving (I still believe real soon now) the letter from the Board on work items related to the DAG, and that we had some transition items to still deal with. It seems that we, unfortunately, still need the meeting. a. On 2 Oct 2009, at 12:03, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Did we not agree on the previous call that this Council call was not necessary?
Sorry if I missed something.
Stéphane