Re: [council] Rationale of thresholds for initiating issues reports and PDPs

Hello Bruce, --- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:

I believe this was to prevent the GNSO Council becoming a barrier for 2-3 constituencies deciding to investigate a matter.

[snip]

I note that none of these issues appeared to come up in the GNSO review process - ie the thresholds for issues reports did not seem to come up as an area of concern. So I am assuming that the Board will not wish to change them.

It makes perfect sense. I note that you carefully :) set aside in your next email my first consclusion and question about the weighted vote: Is there any type of vote where each registry and registrar rep does not count for 2 votes, or is it so for all votes the council take? thanks, Mawaki

Regards, Bruce Tonkin