Sept. 3, 2009
6:39 p.m.
Hi, Wouldn't this be something that would need to worked out with the RAP WG in a WG charter amendment? I tend to see changing the charter as a negotiation process between the council and the WG. thanks a. On 3 Sep 2009, at 20:04, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:
I agree with the RyC edits as friendly amendments, with one exception regarding the mandate to the RAP-WG. Since indemnification is an agreement, and the WG is examining in detail the various agreements in the registration chain, I would clarify and simplify this as follows:
The Registration Abuse Policy Working Group (RAPWG) should examine whether existing policy and/or agreements empower Registries and Registrars to mitigate illicit uses of Fast Flux;