hi all (again). egad. a double apology. here are a couple ideas - expand the time again, maybe just little more - set the expectations for how that time is to be used. my fear is that we’ll get a long slide deck that will fill up the time and give us little opportunity to interact as a group. m On Feb 26, 2014, at 4:28 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:
And it is due to the report that we have given the JIG 30 minutes rather than the 15 that most WGs have for been allotted. Is that time sufficient, or should we expand it?
Regards
David On 26 Feb 2014, at 1:55 am, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Thomas, as the JIG has been requested to provide the GNSO Council with suggestions on how to deal with IDN Variants and universal acceptance and deliver these suggestions to the GNSO Council by the ICANN Singapore meeting, it was envisioned that this conversation could happen in that slot (Saturday from 11.30 - 12.00) but maybe that could be made more explicit?
Best regards,
Marika
On 25/02/14 18:35, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@anwaelte.de> wrote:
Thanks for your work on this, David!
I would very much like to discuss the issue of universal acceptance. One might say that this is an issue for others to resolve, but ICANN will likely be seen as a responsible party for not having taken sufficient steps to ensure new gTLDs "work". Since the original policy recommendations have been made by the GNSO, it appears to be appropriate for the Council to follow-up on this.
Thomas
Am 25.02.2014 um 16:35 schrieb David Cake <dave@DIFFERENCE.COM.AU>:
Please find attached a draft schedule for GNSO activities for the Singapore meeting. Please understand that, though interactions with senior ICANN staff and the board have to contend with very busy schedules, and so may be awkward to change, this is very much a draft schedule, presented for Council discussion and input - please feel free to suggest additional items, or remove them. You'll notice that 15 minutes per WG fills up a fair bit of our schedule, and we have allocated 30 minutes for some - comments on this appreciated. I very much appreciate your input either on list, or on the Council call.
One item I'll note isn't currently on the schedule - the RSSAC is meeting at the Singapore meeting, and this is very unusual. We currently don't have any RSSAC/GNSO interaction scheduled - if council members think this would be valuable, please say so ASAP. Such interaction would have to be from Monday to Wednesday. Regards
David
<Singapore PUBLIC Draft Agenda v3 (2).xlsx>
<default.xml>
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)