I second the motion to expedite the process by three days. This seems absoletely reasonable to me since it will enable the council to finish its work on this PDP at the LA meeting. Best, tom Am 31.08.2007 schrieb Ross Rader:
Philip Sheppard wrote:
I formally oppose the suggestion to shorten the public comment period timetable proposed by the Council chair.
Unseemly haste on this most high profile of issues is unwise.
I believe that the proper process is to request a second on the amendment and then put it to a vote. If the amendment is viewed as unfriendly, it would be voted on separately, IIRC.
If you don't agree with the amendment, then vote against it. If it becomes part of the motion and you are still uncomfortable with it, then vote against the whole package or make a counter-motion.
Also, I'd note that tightening up the schedule by three business days is hardly "unseemly haste", although I do applaud the breadth of your rhetorical skills.
-- Regards,
Ross Rader Director, Retail Services Tucows Inc.
http://www.domaindirect.com t. 416.538.5492
Gruss, tom (__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w