31 May
2016
31 May
'16
9:42 p.m.
Em 31 de mai de 2016, à(s) 17:57:000, Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com> escreveu:
Question:
I have not yet reviewed the proposed amendments to judge how consequential they are.
However, how does this negotiation process between the RySG and ICANN staff relate to the work of the Subsequent Procedures WG?
Phil, ICANN usually tries to make its contracts homogeneous, so it's expected that gTLDs coming from the subsequent procedures to adopt then-current base registry agreements, which will be the 2014 version with the 2016 changes, probably. Rubens