2011/4/14 Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
Rafik,
As much as I love being told I am “incoherent”, I have to admit I don’t understand your response. Literally, I have no idea what you are trying to say.
I said "incoherent position" that is quite different than calling you "incoherent". just for clarification.
If you recall during the Council meeting, I wanted to remove the words “forward to the Board” from the resolution in this case, because the ccNSO had not yet had a chance to weigh in on it. I was afraid that they may not agree with everything and if they did not, then we would have to work things out with the ccNSO to ensure consistency. Once we had a report that we could both support, only then should we forward to the Board. To do otherwise would be for the GNSO to forward 1 version of the report, the ccNSO would forward another version, and somehow we would expect the Board to resolve the differences. To me, that seems unworkable and contrary to bottom-up policy making.
and how we will fix that? it is deadlock otherwise we are prioritizing the response of SO than other . Rafik