Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Council colleagues, I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process. Best wishes, Heather ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org> Dear Community Leaders: We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction. The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process. We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018. Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation. Best, Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN _______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
Thanks, Heather, Michele and I were trying to write a paragraph about the fellowship in our draft response to the travel support consultation few weeks ago, but we all agreed at GNSO that the response would be kept to high level and won't address the questions that were not asked (e.g. fellowship and NextGen). Now, as the fellowship issue is on the table - if GNSO decides to submit a response to this community consultation on the fellowship program, I would like to join the drafting team or take a lead on this, if needed. Cheers, Tanya On 1 February 2018 at 11:15, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
I would like to be involved in the drafting team for this statement too, if we as a Council decide to respond to this questionnaire (and I hope we do). Thank you. Best wishes, Ayden -------- Original Message -------- On 1 February 2018 7:23 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Heather, Michele and I were trying to write a paragraph about the fellowship in our draft response to the travel support consultation few weeks ago, but we all agreed at GNSO that the response would be kept to high level and won't address the questions that were not asked (e.g. fellowship and NextGen). Now, as the fellowship issue is on the table - if GNSO decides to submit a response to this community consultation on the fellowship program, I would like to join the drafting team or take a lead on this, if needed. Cheers, Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:15, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community ConsultationTo: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Happy to join the effort. And here’s a simple teaser: * ICANN needs to cut back on its expenditure on these programmes * ICANN needs to have clear and measurable KPIs to demonstrate the ROI for its dollar spend on these programmes Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ https://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265, Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> Date: Thursday 1 February 2018 at 11:24 To: Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation Thanks, Heather, Michele and I were trying to write a paragraph about the fellowship in our draft response to the travel support consultation few weeks ago, but we all agreed at GNSO that the response would be kept to high level and won't address the questions that were not asked (e.g. fellowship and NextGen). Now, as the fellowship issue is on the table - if GNSO decides to submit a response to this community consultation on the fellowship program, I would like to join the drafting team or take a lead on this, if needed. Cheers, Tanya On 1 February 2018 at 11:15, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Council colleagues, I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process. Best wishes, Heather ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org<mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org<mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>> Dear Community Leaders: We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction. The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process. We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org<mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018. Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation. Best, Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN _______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
All, As an alumni of the Fellowship Program and an active participant for the last three four years in it’s development (I’ve been mentor several times and even did the first version of their coach guide used by alumni to coach new fellows), feel free to ask me anything. I can also take time in a call or write an email if you want me to share the insides of my experience. This offer goes to all Councilors. Cheers, Martín
On 1 Feb 2018, at 16:15, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org <mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org <mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org <mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org <mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders>
<ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation .pdf>_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
Hi Heather, if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort. Best, Rafik 2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
I would also participate on the drafting if it comes to that. Cheers, Martín
On 1 Feb 2018, at 16:30, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com <mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>: Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org <mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org <mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org <mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org <mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all, I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so. Best wishes, Heather On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Heather I’ll check, but to the best of my knowledge there aren’t any fellows in the CPH. I’m not sure we even qualify. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ https://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265, Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> Date: Thursday 1 February 2018 at 11:40 To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all, I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so. Best wishes, Heather On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Heather, if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort. Best, Rafik 2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>: Dear Council colleagues, I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process. Best wishes, Heather ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org<mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org<mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>> Dear Community Leaders: We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction. The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process. We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org<mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018. Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation. Best, Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN _______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal. Marie From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all, I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so. Best wishes, Heather On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Heather, if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort. Best, Rafik 2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>: Dear Council colleagues, I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process. Best wishes, Heather ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org<mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org<mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>> Dear Community Leaders: We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction. The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process. We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org<mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018. Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation. Best, Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN _______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point. SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment. Tanya On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather Forrest *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> *Cc:* GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *David Olive* <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council. — Ayden -------- Original Message -------- On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point. SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment. Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org>Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message -------- On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point. SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment. Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be <mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be>> wrote: Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com <mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org <mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org <mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org <mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org <mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Martin, Ayden, I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so. As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement. Regards, Arsene ------------------------ **Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>* Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international <http://www.rudiinternational.org>*, CEO,* Smart Services Sarl <http://www.smart-serv.info>*, *Mabingwa Forum <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com>* Tel: +243 993810967 GPG: 523644A0 *Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo* 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors> & Mexico <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>) - AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN's GNSO Council <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm> Member. AFRINIC Fellow ( Mauritius <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners>)* - *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom. Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report (English <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>) 2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent < mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message -------- On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point. SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment. Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather Forrest *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> *Cc:* GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *David Olive* <david.olive@icann.org> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Arsene A high level statement that urges ICANN to: * Be fiscally prudent * Track ROI and have clear KPIs Is something that we should be able to agree on. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ https://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265, Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com> Date: Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07 To: "mpsilvavalent@gmail.com" <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation Martin, Ayden, I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so. As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement. Regards, Arsene ------------------------ *Arsène Tungali<http://about.me/ArseneTungali>* Co-Founder & Executive Director, Rudi international<http://www.rudiinternational.org>, CEO, Smart Services Sarl<http://www.smart-serv.info>, Mabingwa Forum<http://www.mabingwa-forum.com> Tel: +243 993810967 GPG: 523644A0 Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow<http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil<http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors> & Mexico<http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>) - AFRISIG 2016<http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger<http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN's GNSO Council<https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm> Member. AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius<http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners>) - IGFSA Member<http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom. Check the 2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC report (English<http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French<http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>) 2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com<mailto:mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>>: I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed. On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote: I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council. — Ayden -------- Original Message -------- On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com<mailto:tatiana.tropina@gmail.com>> wrote: I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point. SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment. Tanya On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be<mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be>> wrote: Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal. Marie From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all, I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so. Best wishes, Heather On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Heather, if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort. Best, Rafik 2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>: Dear Council colleagues, I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process. Best wishes, Heather ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org<mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org<mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>> Dear Community Leaders: We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction. The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process. We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org<mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018. Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation. Best, Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN _______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org<mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
+1 to Michele. Can't see any difficulties agreeing on such a statement on the GNSO Council level -- unless, of course, someone is against fiscal prudence and clear KPIs and ROI. Cheers, Tanya On 2 February 2018 at 06:21, Michele Neylon - Blacknight < michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Arsene
A high level statement that urges ICANN to:
- Be fiscally prudent - Track ROI and have clear KPIs
Is something that we should be able to agree on.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 <+353%2059%20918%203072>
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 <+353%2059%20918%203090>
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
Ireland Company No.: 370845
*From: *council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com> *Date: *Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07 *To: *"mpsilvavalent@gmail.com" <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>
*Cc: *GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Martin, Ayden,
I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so.
As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement.
Regards,
Arsene
------------------------ **Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international* <http://www.rudiinternational.org>, CEO, *Smart Services Sarl* <http://www.smart-serv.info>, *Mabingwa Forum* <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com> Tel: +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967>
GPG: 523644A0
*Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*
2015 Mandela Washington Felllow <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors> & Mexico <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>) - AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN's GNSO Council <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm> Member. AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners> )* - *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom.
Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report (English <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>)
2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent < mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message --------
On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point.
SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment.
Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather Forrest *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> *Cc:* GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *David Olive* <david.olive@icann.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM
Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>
Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________
So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list
So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Apologies, everyone, for the holes in my notes on this one. It's clear from the responses here that there is interest in putting together high-level comments. It looks like our drafting team is Ayden, Tanya, Martin, Michele, Rafik - any others can contact these folks. Who will be the leader to get this done by the submission deadline? Best wishes, Heather On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 to Michele. Can't see any difficulties agreeing on such a statement on the GNSO Council level -- unless, of course, someone is against fiscal prudence and clear KPIs and ROI. Cheers, Tanya
On 2 February 2018 at 06:21, Michele Neylon - Blacknight < michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Arsene
A high level statement that urges ICANN to:
- Be fiscally prudent - Track ROI and have clear KPIs
Is something that we should be able to agree on.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 <+353%2059%20918%203072>
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 <+353%2059%20918%203090>
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
Ireland Company No.: 370845
*From: *council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com> *Date: *Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07 *To: *"mpsilvavalent@gmail.com" <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>
*Cc: *GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Martin, Ayden,
I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so.
As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement.
Regards,
Arsene
------------------------ **Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international* <http://www.rudiinternational.org>, CEO, *Smart Services Sarl* <http://www.smart-serv.info>, *Mabingwa Forum* <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com> Tel: +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967>
GPG: 523644A0
*Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*
2015 Mandela Washington Felllow <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors> & Mexico <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>) - AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger <http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN's GNSO Council <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm> Member. AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners> )* - *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom.
Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report (English <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>)
2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent < mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message --------
On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point.
SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment.
Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
*From:* council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Heather Forrest *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> *Cc:* GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *David Olive* <david.olive@icann.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM
Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>
Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj < ergys.ramaj@icann.org>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________
So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list
So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
We will take this conversation off-list for now, and return to this thread once we (the drafting team) have some suggested text for your review. Please write to me if you would like to be added to the new thread, and have not already indicated so. Thanks! — Ayden -------- Original Message -------- On 2 February 2018 10:01 PM, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Apologies, everyone, for the holes in my notes on this one.
It's clear from the responses here that there is interest in putting together high-level comments. It looks like our drafting team is Ayden, Tanya, Martin, Michele, Rafik - any others can contact these folks. Who will be the leader to get this done by the submission deadline?
Best wishes,
Heather
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 to Michele. Can't see any difficulties agreeing on such a statement on the GNSO Council level -- unless, of course, someone is against fiscal prudence and clear KPIs and ROI. Cheers, Tanya
On 2 February 2018 at 06:21, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Arsene
A high level statement that urges ICANN to:
- Be fiscally prudent
- Track ROI and have clear KPIs
Is something that we should be able to agree on.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. [+353 (0) 59 9183072](tel:+353%2059%20918%203072)
Direct Dial: [+353 (0)59 9183090](tel:+353%2059%20918%203090)
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
Ireland Company No.: 370845
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com> Date: Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07 To: "mpsilvavalent@gmail.com" <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
[Martin, Ayden,]
I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so.
As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement.
Regards,
Arsene
------------------------ *[Arsène Tungali](http://about.me/ArseneTungali)*
Co-Founder & Executive Director, [Rudi international](http://www.rudiinternational.org), CEO,[Smart Services Sarl](http://www.smart-serv.info), [Mabingwa Forum](http://www.mabingwa-forum.com) Tel: [+243 993810967](tel:+243%20993%20810%20967)
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
[2015 Mandela Washington Felllow](http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.htm...) (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF [Brazil](http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programme...) & [Mexico](http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programme...)) - [AFRISIG 2016](http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/) - [Blogger](http://tungali.blogspot.com) - ICANN's [GNSO Council](https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm) Member.AFRINIC Fellow([Mauritius](http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners)) - [IGFSA Member](http://www.igfsa.org/) - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom.
Check the 2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC report ([English](http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234)) and ([French](http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242))
2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message --------
On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point.
SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment.
Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
> Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal. > > Marie > > From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> > Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation > > Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all, > > I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so. > > Best wishes, > > Heather > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Heather, >> >> if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort. >> >> Best, >> >> Rafik >> >> 2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com>: >> >>> Dear Council colleagues, >>> >>> I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Heather >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> >>> From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> >>> >>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM >>> >>> Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation >>> >>> To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> >>> >>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org> >>> >>>> Dear Community Leaders: >>> >>>> We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction. >>>> >>>> The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process. >>>> >>>> We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org by 30 March 2018. >>>> >>>> Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Ergys Ramaj >>>> Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list >>> >>> So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org >>> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> council mailing list >>> >>> council@gnso.icann.org >>> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council > > _______________________________________________ > > council mailing list > > council@gnso.icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing listcouncil@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing listcouncil@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
FYI: The icann.org <http://icann.org/> web has been deeply updated on information on the fellowship (and it seems is just the beginning on more information and better skills communication). Is worth a surfing if you are interested in the topic. https://www.icann.org/fellowshipprogram <https://www.icann.org/fellowshipprogram> Cheers, Martín
On 2 Feb 2018, at 20:31, Ayden Férdeline <icann@FERDELINE.COM> wrote:
We will take this conversation off-list for now, and return to this thread once we (the drafting team) have some suggested text for your review. Please write to me if you would like to be added to the new thread, and have not already indicated so. Thanks!
— Ayden
-------- Original Message -------- On 2 February 2018 10:01 PM, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Apologies, everyone, for the holes in my notes on this one.
It's clear from the responses here that there is interest in putting together high-level comments. It looks like our drafting team is Ayden, Tanya, Martin, Michele, Rafik - any others can contact these folks. Who will be the leader to get this done by the submission deadline?
Best wishes,
Heather
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com <mailto:tatiana.tropina@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 to Michele. Can't see any difficulties agreeing on such a statement on the GNSO Council level -- unless, of course, someone is against fiscal prudence and clear KPIs and ROI. Cheers, Tanya
On 2 February 2018 at 06:21, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com <mailto:michele@blacknight.com>> wrote: Arsene
A high level statement that urges ICANN to:
Be fiscally prudent Track ROI and have clear KPIs Is something that we should be able to agree on.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/ <https://www.blacknight.com/> https://blacknight.blog/ <https://blacknight.blog/> https://ceo.hosting/ <https://ceo.hosting/> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 <tel:+353%2059%20918%203072> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 <tel:+353%2059%20918%203090> -------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,
Ireland Company No.: 370845
From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com <mailto:arsenebaguma@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday 1 February 2018 at 21:07 To: "mpsilvavalent@gmail.com <mailto:mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>" <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com <mailto:mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Martin, Ayden, <> I am sure sharing your experiences with the Council in an informational email would be great as to give an idea of the insides (pros and cons) of the fellowship to those (like the CPH) who might not have been involved in the Fellowship program or the NextGen program. So, please do go ahead and start an email thread, if you wish so.
As for a Council comment, i don't have any hard feelings about this but would strongly agree with Heather on the need to focus on what we have on our plate to cover and leave the SG/Cs to be heavily involved in putting together their own comment/answers to the question. Also, we are far from having the same understanding or the same view on these programs (even inside SGs), so it will be very difficult for us to agree, as a Council, on a joint statement.
Regards,
Arsene
------------------------ *Arsène Tungali <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
Co-Founder & Executive Director, Rudi international <http://www.rudiinternational.org/>, CEO, Smart Services Sarl <http://www.smart-serv.info/>, Mabingwa Forum <http://www.mabingwa-forum.com/> Tel: +243 993810967 <tel:+243%20993%20810%20967> GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
2015 Mandela Washington Felllow <http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html> (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors> & Mexico <http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>) - AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger <http://tungali.blogspot.com/> - ICANN's GNSO Council <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/gnso-council.htm> Member. AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius <http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners>) - IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet Freedom.
Check the 2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC report (English <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French <http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>)
2018-02-01 23:06 GMT+03:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent <mpsilvavalent@gmail.com <mailto:mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>>:
I never proposed to add MY personal experience, but to share them with the Council if they were needed.
On 1 Feb 2018, at 17:05, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com <mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> wrote:
I agree. I do not think it is helpful to add personal anecdotes to this letter (or I could share some healthy counter perspectives to Martin's views), but given the programme's sizeable cost and ICANN's stabilising budget, I think we would be remiss if we did not comment broadly on the need to measure the effectiveness of the fellowship programme in terms of bringing active participants into the ICANN community and onto the GNSO Council.
— Ayden
-------- Original Message --------
On 1 February 2018 7:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com <mailto:tatiana.tropina@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would go with Marie's suggestion - why don't we submit several points and keep it high level. Michele's suggestions are important and it would be good if we make the point.
SGs can submit their comments re: experience and capacity building. But as we are calling for fiscal prudence, I think it's important to make a short and concise comment.
Tanya
On 1 February 2018 at 11:44, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be <mailto:marie.pattullo@aim.be>> wrote:
Your way forward seems logical to me Heather; if Council does want to comment separately then a high-level shout out of Michele’s 2 points (budget cuts & KPIs to ensure that there is real ROI) would make sense, and fit within our overall good governance/stewardship goal.
Marie
From: council [mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>] On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 8:39 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com <mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>:
Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org <mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>
Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM
Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation
To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>>
Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org <mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org <mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org <mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________
So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list
So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders>
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________
council mailing list
council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Heather, I agree with that, I will just leave my offer to anyone interested in the matter for a first person experience, with the good and bad of that. Cheers, Martín
On 1 Feb 2018, at 16:39, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Rafik, Ayden, Martin, all,
I understood the interventions as we wrapped up Donna's review of the "evil spreadsheet" as that, in view of the tremendous volume of work we now have on our collective plates as Council (liaison expectation documentations, refilling liaison roles, White Paper on PDP incremental improvements, ICANN61 planning), we would do well to leave the comment opportunity to SG/Cs, and that would also give the individual SG/Cs room to leverage the specific and individualised experience with Fellows in their communities. If I have misunderstood and there's a clear need for Council itself to make a statement, I'll encourage any and all to jump in here and say so.
Best wishes,
Heather
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Heather,
if there is support within the council to respond to this comment since some points were made before with regard to budget, I will be happy to lead the effort.
Best,
Rafik
2018-02-02 4:15 GMT+09:00 Heather Forrest <haforrestesq@gmail.com <mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>: Dear Council colleagues,
I recall Michele Neylon making reference to the Fellowship review during our 3 days together. Please find here documentation about that process.
Best wishes,
Heather
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org <mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:15 AM Subject: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN Fellowship Program Community Consultation To: "so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>" <so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:so-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org>> Cc: Sally Costerton <sally.costerton@icann.org <mailto:sally.costerton@icann.org>>, Ergys Ramaj <ergys.ramaj@icann.org <mailto:ergys.ramaj@icann.org>>
Dear Community Leaders:
We’re launching a community-wide consultation on the Fellowship Program to help inform its future direction.
The attached paper provides an overview of the program, including a breakdown of the data available on the Fellows, a questionnaire, and other details about the consultation process.
We anticipate that there will be interest in further discussing this process and our team will be available to speak with community groups about the current Fellowship Program and the questionnaire at ICANN61 or remotely. Questions about the program and responses to the questionnaire should be sent to fellowshipconsultation@icann.org <mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org> by 30 March 2018.
Grateful if you could share this informationso that each community group is aware of and has the opportunity to participate in the consultation.
Best,
Ergys Ramaj Sr. Director, Public Responsibility Support, ICANN
_______________________________________________ So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org <mailto:So-ac-sg-cleaders@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council>
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
participants (8)
-
Arsène Tungali -
Ayden Férdeline -
Heather Forrest -
Marie Pattullo -
Martin Pablo Silva Valent -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight -
Rafik Dammak -
Tatiana Tropina