Could we - as a friendly amendment - add to the Motion No. 1 the following sentence at the end of the last para.: "Furthermore it is planned to publish the Final Report by October 2012."? The WG charter on its page 2 seems to be ambiguous in this respect since it sets a deadline of March 2012 (or maybe this sentence should be deleted). Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
I second the motion 6 made by Jonathan Robinson. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Subject: [council] Motion on WS-WG Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:45:41 +0200 From: KnobenW@telekom.de To: council@gnso.icann.org Motion on WS-WG Could we - as a friendly amendment - add to the Motion No. 1 the following sentence at the end of the last para.: "Furthermore it is planned to publish the Final Report by October 2012."? The WG charter on its page 2 seems to be ambiguous in this respect since it sets a deadline of March 2012 (or maybe this sentence should be deleted). Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
Thanks Carlos. Glen, could you please update the wiki accordingly? Thanks. Stéphane Le 6 oct. 2011 à 15:51, carlos dionisio aguirre a écrit :
I second the motion 6 made by Jonathan Robinson.
Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org
Subject: [council] Motion on WS-WG Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:45:41 +0200 From: KnobenW@telekom.de To: council@gnso.icann.org
Could we - as a friendly amendment - add to the Motion No. 1 the following sentence at the end of the last para.: "Furthermore it is planned to publish the Final Report by October 2012."? The WG charter on its page 2 seems to be ambiguous in this respect since it sets a deadline of March 2012 (or maybe this sentence should be deleted). Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
Done, thanks Glen From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: jeudi 6 octobre 2011 15:53 To: carlos dionisio aguirre Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: Re: [council] 6. MOTION TO CREATE A GNSO DRAFTING TEAM ON CROSS COMMUNITY WORKING GROUPS (CCWG) Thanks Carlos. Glen, could you please update the wiki accordingly? Thanks. Stéphane Le 6 oct. 2011 à 15:51, carlos dionisio aguirre a écrit : I second the motion 6 made by Jonathan Robinson. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org ________________________________ Subject: [council] Motion on WS-WG Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:45:41 +0200 From: KnobenW@telekom.de<mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de> To: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Could we - as a friendly amendment - add to the Motion No. 1 the following sentence at the end of the last para.: "Furthermore it is planned to publish the Final Report by October 2012."? The WG charter on its page 2 seems to be ambiguous in this respect since it sets a deadline of March 2012 (or maybe this sentence should be deleted). Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
Hi Wolf-Ulrich and all, You have identified a mistake in the charter that I did not catch. On page 2 we actually state two different dates for completion of the report, March 2012 in the sentence Wolf notes, and October 2012 in the Overall Milestones. This is due to a bit of back and forth on what dates were achievable, but the correct date should be October 2012. Attached is a draft charter that corrects that mistake, but I would agree with Wolf-Ulrich that the phrase "...delivering a draft report describing survey results and recommendations for next steps to the GNSO Council" in the last sentence of the motion could be augmented to say ""...delivering a draft report describing survey results and recommendations for next steps to the GNSO Council BY OCTOBER 2012" and this would clarify the correct delivery estimate. Thanks, and I apologize for the oversight in the Charter. Liz From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW@telekom.de Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 3:46 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Motion on WS-WG Could we - as a friendly amendment - add to the Motion No. 1 the following sentence at the end of the last para.: "Furthermore it is planned to publish the Final Report by October 2012."? The WG charter on its page 2 seems to be ambiguous in this respect since it sets a deadline of March 2012 (or maybe this sentence should be deleted). Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
participants (5)
-
carlos dionisio aguirre -
Glen de Saint Géry -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Liz Gasster -
Stéphane Van Gelder