Fwd: Suggested election time lines
Councillors, As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here). You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year. To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this. As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen. We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot. Please let us have your comments on these proposals. Thanks, Stéphane
Councillors, As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios. Thanks, Stéphane Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors,
As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane, Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election. --Wendy On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors,
As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Thanks Wendy for your comments. Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair. However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place. So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time? Thanks, Stéphane Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors,
As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
You're right, Stéphane. It's in the ISPCP pipe already in order to cope with this timeline. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 13:52 An: Wendy Seltzer Cc: Council GNSO Betreff: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Thanks Wendy for your comments. Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair. However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place. So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time? Thanks, Stéphane Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors,
As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Thanks Wolf. Stéphane Le 14 juil. 2011 à 16:23, <KnobenW@telekom.de> a écrit :
You're right, Stéphane. It's in the ISPCP pipe already in order to cope with this timeline.
Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011 13:52 An: Wendy Seltzer Cc: Council GNSO Betreff: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors,
As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
NCSG is also working on its Council elections. A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first. --Wendy On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done? Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166 -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines NCSG is also working on its Council elections. A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first. --Wendy On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline. Thanks, Stéphane Envoyé de mon iPhone4 Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Hi should we include SGs Chairs in this discussion eg NCSG Chair is Avri and she will be handling our internal election process It might be easier if the SG Chairs are directly included in this discussion Cheers Rosemary ________________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder [stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 7:41 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline. Thanks, Stéphane Envoyé de mon iPhone4 Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Rosemary, You will recall that last year I proposed that a mailing list be set up between the SG Chairs and the Council leadership to aid communication. The Council thought this was not necessary. If I recall, one of the arguments against this idea was that as Councillors are tasked with acting as liaisons to their respective groups anyway, there was no need for an extra channel of communication. Any reason why this specific issue should be any different? Do you not think that Councillors can simply liaise with their groups and take back our discussions? I know that is what I did with the RrSG leadership... Thanks, Stéphane Le 14 juil. 2011 à 23:46, Rosemary Sinclair a écrit :
Hi
should we include SGs Chairs in this discussion eg NCSG Chair is Avri and she will be handling our internal election process
It might be easier if the SG Chairs are directly included in this discussion
Cheers
Rosemary ________________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder [stephane.vangelder@indom.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 7:41 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Envoyé de mon iPhone4
Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
I agree with Jeff and SVG. How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness... Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline. Thanks, Stéphane Envoyé de mon iPhone4 Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership. Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully. Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines I agree with Jeff and SVG. How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness... Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline. Thanks, Stéphane Envoyé de mon iPhone4 Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be
the
old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
I understand the issues raised by the NCSG. However I'm opposed to postpone council chair elections. I'm also not a friend of mixing up competencies of different institutions (SG/constituency and council). My proposal (for this time) covered by the rules and bylaws: - take option 1 of Stéphane's paper: this allows for 3 weeks more time of candidate nomination than option 2 - in case new councillors can't be seated in time let the incumbents vote This discussion arises only from the requirement that new council members should be given a chance to vote and the time constraints between chair election and new council seating. To my knowledge it was not covered during the bylaws and rules of procedure review. It could be an agenda item for the SCI to find a viable solution for the future - if the council so wishes. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich ________________________________ Von: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juli 2011 01:12 Cc: Council GNSO Betreff: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership. Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully. Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu >>> From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines I agree with Jeff and SVG. How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness... Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline. Thanks, Stéphane Envoyé de mon iPhone4 Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Thanks Mary. I understand and appreciate the NCSG's issues. However, considering these special circumstances, could the NCSG not extend their current councillors until they are in a position to elect new ones? And if not, what do you suggest be done? That the Council extend its officers instead? If so, for how long? I'm just trying to get a clear picture of what's being asked of us, especially in the light of other Councillors' comments that we should go with option 1 and not delay the elections. Thanks, Stéphane Le 15 juil. 2011 à 01:11, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit :
Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership.
Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully.
Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
I agree with Jeff and SVG.
How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness...
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Envoyé de mon iPhone4
Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Hi Stephane and everyone - sorry if I wasn't clear before; the NCSG fully intends to comply with all the time lines and dates, so we are not suggesting a postponement. Some of us were merely thinking ahead, of "what ifs"; I haven't consulted the NCSG officers and Councilors on this, but - in answer to your question, and assuming there comes a "what if" scenario - my guess is that extending the current Council leadership term temporarily would seem to most to be the preferable alternative. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To:"<Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>" <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> CC:"Council GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/15/2011 2:09 PM Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Thanks Mary. I understand and appreciate the NCSG's issues. However, considering these special circumstances, could the NCSG not extend their current councillors until they are in a position to elect new ones? And if not, what do you suggest be done? That the Council extend its officers instead? If so, for how long? I'm just trying to get a clear picture of what's being asked of us, especially in the light of other Councillors' comments that we should go with option 1 and not delay the elections. Thanks, Stéphane Le 15 juil. 2011 à 01:11, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit : Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership. Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully. Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG. Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines I agree with Jeff and SVG. How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness... Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline. Thanks, Stéphane Envoyé de mon iPhone4 Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be
the
old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
Councillors, A t As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here).
You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year.
To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this.
As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen.
We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot.
Please let us have your comments on these proposals.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Thanks Mary for that clarification. How long would that "temporary" be do you think? Stéphane Le 15 juil. 2011 à 22:21, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit :
Hi Stephane and everyone - sorry if I wasn't clear before; the NCSG fully intends to comply with all the time lines and dates, so we are not suggesting a postponement.
Some of us were merely thinking ahead, of "what ifs"; I haven't consulted the NCSG officers and Councilors on this, but - in answer to your question, and assuming there comes a "what if" scenario - my guess is that extending the current Council leadership term temporarily would seem to most to be the preferable alternative.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@law.unh.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com> To: "<Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu>" <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> CC: "Council GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/15/2011 2:09 PM Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines Thanks Mary.
I understand and appreciate the NCSG's issues. However, considering these special circumstances, could the NCSG not extend their current councillors until they are in a position to elect new ones?
And if not, what do you suggest be done? That the Council extend its officers instead? If so, for how long?
I'm just trying to get a clear picture of what's being asked of us, especially in the light of other Councillors' comments that we should go with option 1 and not delay the elections.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 15 juil. 2011 à 01:11, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit :
Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership.
Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully.
Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
I agree with Jeff and SVG.
How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness...
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Envoyé de mon iPhone4
Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
> Councillors, > A t > As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here). > > You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year. > > To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this. > > As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen. > > We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot. > > Please let us have your comments on these proposals. > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > <GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Hi Stéphane Nothing is being asked of the Council and it's not obvious we need a discussion here of NCSG's internal challenges. We've got some time here before Dakar so how about NC works on it's charter approval process and elections and we get back to you later if it appears there will be a timing issue of relevance to the Council? Thanks, Bill On Jul 15, 2011, at 20:08, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> wrote:
Thanks Mary.
I understand and appreciate the NCSG's issues. However, considering these special circumstances, could the NCSG not extend their current councillors until they are in a position to elect new ones?
And if not, what do you suggest be done? That the Council extend its officers instead? If so, for how long?
I'm just trying to get a clear picture of what's being asked of us, especially in the light of other Councillors' comments that we should go with option 1 and not delay the elections.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 15 juil. 2011 à 01:11, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit :
Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership.
Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully.
Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
I agree with Jeff and SVG.
How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness...
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Envoyé de mon iPhone4
Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Councillors,
As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
> Councillors, > A t > As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here). > > You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year. > > To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this. > > As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen. > > We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot. > > Please let us have your comments on these proposals. > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > <GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc>
Sounds great Bill, thanks. Stéphane Le 16 juil. 2011 à 08:49, William Drake a écrit :
Hi Stéphane
Nothing is being asked of the Council and it's not obvious we need a discussion here of NCSG's internal challenges. We've got some time here before Dakar so how about NC works on it's charter approval process and elections and we get back to you later if it appears there will be a timing issue of relevance to the Council?
Thanks,
Bill
On Jul 15, 2011, at 20:08, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> wrote:
Thanks Mary.
I understand and appreciate the NCSG's issues. However, considering these special circumstances, could the NCSG not extend their current councillors until they are in a position to elect new ones?
And if not, what do you suggest be done? That the Council extend its officers instead? If so, for how long?
I'm just trying to get a clear picture of what's being asked of us, especially in the light of other Councillors' comments that we should go with option 1 and not delay the elections.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 15 juil. 2011 à 01:11, <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> <Mary.Wong@law.unh.edu> a écrit :
Hello - I can try to explain some of the issues. NCSG intends fully to comply with and meet all the mandated deadlines; however, the Council should know that we are probably laboring under greater pressure than most of the other groups. This is because the new NCSG Charter was just approved by the Board in Singapore, and we've also had a large number of new members (both directly into the SG and through the newly-approved Not for Profit Operational Concerns (NPOC) Constituency). We will also have to elect (or re-elect, as may happen) 4 Councilors, including transitioning from having 3 Board appointed Councilors to all Councilors being elected by the SG (i.e. under the approved Charter, elections for Council seats are SG-wide, not via Constituencies), which can happen only procedurally after the new Charter is formally approved and accepted by the SG membership.
Mind you, I'm not making an early excuse for delay - like I said, we (especially our SG Chair and Executive Committee) are working hard to make sure not only that all relevant time lines are met, but that the elections are sufficiently well-publicized so that we will have good candidates coming forward (from various geographical regions, as mandated by our Charter) and that all SG members (especially the newer ones) know about the elections and can participate fully.
Hopefully this explains some of the concerns that have been raised and gives the Council a sense of what we are having to do within NCSG.
Cheers Mary
Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> CC: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com>, Council GNSO <council@gnso.icann.org> Date: 7/14/2011 5:59 PM Subject: RE: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
I agree with Jeff and SVG.
How typical of our GNSO/ ICANN psyche that we instantly look to move a deadline rather than address the issue of tardiness...
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Friday, 15 July 2011 7:42 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: Wendy Seltzer; Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
Agree with Jeff that extending is not an option. If SGs find they cannot elect their new reps in time for Dakar, then they should look to extend the terms of their own Councillors so as not to impact the bylaw-mandated leadership election timeline.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Envoyé de mon iPhone4
Le 14 juil. 2011 à 21:09, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> a écrit :
The election timelines are set forth in the Bylaws. Given that we still have 3 months until the annual meeting, shouldn't that be enough time to get everything done?
Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:05 PM To: Stéphane Van Gelder Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Re: Suggested election time lines
NCSG is also working on its Council elections.
A third option would be to postpone our Council elections (and briefly extend the terms of current officers) if some SGs need a slightly longer window to complete their Councillor elections first.
--Wendy
On 07/14/2011 07:52 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Wendy for your comments.
Yes that is correct, we designed option 1 to address the points made at the previous election and allow for the new Council to elect its Chair.
However, I think it's worth stressing that for this option to be viable, we need to be sure that all SGs that are due to replace Councillors will have done so in plenty of time for this vote to take place.
So my message was also a request to you, as representatives of your groups, to let the Council leadership and secretariat know if your own individual elections would be done in time?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 13 juil. 2011 à 18:34, Wendy Seltzer a écrit :
Thanks for getting the conversation started Stéphane,
Does the second, electronic, option assume that the voters would be the old Councillors, since the new ones will not be seated until the end of the AGM? If so, I would strongly support option 1, to give the Councillors who will be serving under the chair an opportunity to vote in the Chair's election.
--Wendy
On 07/13/2011 12:17 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote: > Councillors, > > As a follow-up to this, please see attached a slightly modified note. The change is just to clarify one of the election procedure scenarios. > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > > > > > Le 11 juil. 2011 à 17:18, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit : > >> Councillors, >> A t >> As the Dakar meeting looms, one of the items we must cover is the elections of the next Council Chair (the VCs are house-specific and therefore do not need to be determined here). >> >> You will remember that last year's elections gave rise to some debate, and that the Council felt it would be useful to plan ahead a little more for this year. >> >> To start this process along, I have been working with Glen to produce two possible scenarios for running the elections. These are attached. My thanks to Glen for her hard work on this. >> >> As you will see from the attached, the options we have looked at are to try and address the wish that was expressed by some last year that it be the new Council that elect the Chair. There are some scheduling issues to address, and if the Council decides to elect its new Chair in Dakar, then we will have to work closely with those SGs electing new Councillors to ensure that those elections are done in plenty of time to allow for the Chair election to happen. >> >> We also ask the question, if we have an election in Dakar (rather than the 2nd option of an electronic ballot beforehand) of whether the vote should be by open or secret ballot. >> >> Please let us have your comments on these proposals. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Stéphane >> >> <GNSO Council Election Procedures for the GNSO Council Chair to be seated in Dakar in October 2011.doc> >
participants (8)
-
Adrian Kinderis -
KnobenW＠telekom.de -
Mary.Wong＠law.unh.edu -
Neuman, Jeff -
Rosemary Sinclair -
Stéphane Van Gelder -
Wendy Seltzer -
William Drake