RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98ca48fb917f289f499a3db6d27b8b4f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Further to my email below I'd like to suggest the following amendment; Proposed amendment: Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause: Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July. Adrian Kinderis From: Adrian Kinderis Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment All, Much to Glen's displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the IRTP-B Motion. The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a common position on the complete motion. I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head's up. Thanks. Adrian Kinderis
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/21cfbce914d7e30e5d906dec1a9a4eb8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Thanks Adrian. Tim, Jonathan, how say you? Stéphane Le 21 juin 2011 à 12:17, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :
Further to my email below I’d like to suggest the following amendment;
Proposed amendment:
Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:
Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
Adrian Kinderis
From: Adrian Kinderis Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
All,
Much to Glen’s displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the IRTP-B Motion.
The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a common position on the complete motion.
I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head’s up.
Thanks.
Adrian Kinderis
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I accept as friendly. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> Sender: owner-council@gnso.icann.org Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:20:33 To: Adrian Kinderis<adrian@ausregistry.com.au> Cc: GNSO Council List<council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment Thanks Adrian. Tim, Jonathan, how say you? Stéphane Le 21 juin 2011 à 12:17, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :
Further to my email below I’d like to suggest the following amendment;
Proposed amendment:
Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:
Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
Adrian Kinderis
From: Adrian Kinderis Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
All,
Much to Glen’s displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the IRTP-B Motion.
The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a common position on the complete motion.
I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head’s up.
Thanks.
Adrian Kinderis
participants (3)
-
Adrian Kinderis
-
Stéphane Van Gelder
-
tim@godaddy.com