FW: [REGYCON] IPC Proposed Revised IGO DRP
Olof, Here is David's response to your query. Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." ________________________________ From: GNSO Registry Constituency Planning [mailto:REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM] On Behalf Of David W. Maher Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:39 AM To: REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM Subject: [REGYCON] IPC Proposed Revised IGO DRP Olof: Chuck Gomes asked me to reply to your question: about the inner meaning of what you call the "treaty route". Would that imply a) all IGOs do like the Red Cross and nail the name protection in their respective treaties or b) some overarching treaty for all IGOs clarifying name protection for them all, a kind of "Paris Convention +" or c) something else? The answer is all of the above. The "treaty route" is the way nations to protect their national interests and the jurisdiction of their courts. David David W. Maher Senior Vice President - Law & Policy Public Interest Registry 1775 Wiehle Ave, #102A Reston, VA 20190 USA (v) +1-312-876-8055 (f) +1-312-876-7934 http://www.pir.org <http://www.pir.org/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
Thanks, Chuck and David! Just one comment: When it comes to my "b", I believe the legal basis for protection of IGO names and abbreviations as domain names based on the existing Paris Convention has been clarified thru the UN Legal Services letter on the subject from March 2005, see: http://www.icann.org/correspondence/michel-to-cerf-23mar05.pdf . Very best regards Olof _____ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: den 30 november 2007 17:55 To: Olof Nordling Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David W. Maher Subject: [council] FW: [REGYCON] IPC Proposed Revised IGO DRP Olof, Here is David's response to your query. Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." _____ From: GNSO Registry Constituency Planning [mailto:REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM] On Behalf Of David W. Maher Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:39 AM To: REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM Subject: [REGYCON] IPC Proposed Revised IGO DRP Olof: Chuck Gomes asked me to reply to your question: about the inner meaning of what you call the "treaty route". Would that imply a) all IGOs do like the Red Cross and nail the name protection in their respective treaties or b) some overarching treaty for all IGOs clarifying name protection for them all, a kind of "Paris Convention +" or c) something else? The answer is all of the above. The "treaty route" is the way nations to protect their national interests and the jurisdiction of their courts. David David W. Maher Senior Vice President - Law & Policy Public Interest Registry 1775 Wiehle Ave, #102A Reston, VA 20190 USA (v) +1-312-876-8055 (f) +1-312-876-7934 http://www.pir.org <http://www.pir.org/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
I believe one reason the IGOs did not wish to go the 'international treaty route" described by Mr Maher was that is takes about 10 years to get one. Given this issue within ICANN dates to 2003 I note that we are currently doing rather well in pursuit of ten-year decision making timelines ourselves. Philip
participants (3)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
Olof Nordling -
Philip Sheppard