RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
Hello Lucy, I will add this to the agenda. Regards, Bruce
-----Original Message----- From: Lucy.Nichols@nokia.com [mailto:Lucy.Nichols@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2004 2:15 PM To: Bruce Tonkin; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
Bruce,
Please add the following item to the agenda under AOB: update from staff on WIPO-II recommendation to the ICANN Board.
Regards,
Lucy Nichols
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org]On Behalf Of ext Bruce Tonkin Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:57 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
Hello All,
Just a reminder that as there is a vote scheduled in this council teleconference, please ensure that if you can't attend you appoint a proxy and provide voting instructions for that proxy.
Thanks, Bruce Tonkin
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin Sent: Wednesday, 10 November 2004 8:49 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004
Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 November 2004
NOTE CHANGE IN TIME FOR MEETING FOR NORTHERN HEMISPHERE WINTER TIME
Coordinated Universal Time UTC 19:00
(11am Los Angeles, 2pm Washington DC, 7pm London, 6am (next day) Melbourne )
Item 1: Approval of minutes of 21 October 2004
Item 2: Election of GNSO Council chair for 12 month term
Item 3: Update on Draft initial report on procedure for use by ICANN in considering requests for consent and related contractual amendments to allow changes in the architecture and operation of a gTLD registry.
Item 4: Update on process for review of GNSO Council
Item 5: ICANN strategic plan (due to be published on 16 Nov)
Item 6: Update on WHOIS
Item 7: update on planning for ICANN meeting in Cape Town
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
Dear Bruce, As an elected rep to the BC on Council, I support the request for information and offer the following thought: The working group on WIPO II did not achieve consensus. Changes in policy by ICANN require consensus In the BC, we have received inquiries from our members, regarding the action of the ICANN regarding this issue. I want to support raisign this issue in Council to a priority level, and noting to the Board and staff that there is no support to make changes, given that there is no consensus in the working group. I welcome the opportunity to discuss this within Council and will be on Thursday's call. I have to leave at 3:30 EST, so ask that this issue be raised between 2 and 3:00 p.m. so that I can help to address it. Best regards, Marilyn
This is a pretty serious topic, I agree, as another elected rep. I do not mind at all that we discuss this tomorrow. I would oppose though any attempt to rush anything through tomorrow. Be it dismissing the whole WIPO II request (which my constituency wouldn't mind as such) or taking some position. We need serious discussion about this topic, which cannot be accomplished in one teleconference as such short notice. I suggest we discuss WIPO II on this list before we make _any_ decision. Thanks. Marc Schneiders On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, at 19:52 [=GMT-0500], Marilyn Cade wrote:
Dear Bruce, As an elected rep to the BC on Council, I support the request for information and offer the following thought:
The working group on WIPO II did not achieve consensus. Changes in policy by ICANN require consensus In the BC, we have received inquiries from our members, regarding the action of the ICANN regarding this issue.
I want to support raisign this issue in Council to a priority level, and noting to the Board and staff that there is no support to make changes, given that there is no consensus in the working group.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss this within Council and will be on Thursday's call. I have to leave at 3:30 EST, so ask that this issue be raised between 2 and 3:00 p.m. so that I can help to address it.
Best regards,
Marilyn
Dear Marc: I share your concerns about the seriousness of this topic and I in fact raised it during the ICANN Board call this past Monday and in an email to the Board mailing list last evening. As Board member elected through the GNSO I believe it is important to let council know that I am monitoring their concerns, however, I believe it is most appropriate to allow staff to give an update on this matter. I hope that either Paul or Kurt will be able to do this during tomorrow's call. I also support your recommendations about a proper and fully informed discussion on this topic, as Article III, Section 6 of the ICANN Bylaws sets forth specific guidance with regard to notice and comment on policy actions. I look forward to seeing you and your fellow Council members in Cape Town. Best regards, Michael D. Palage -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org]On Behalf Of Marc Schneiders Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:10 PM To: Marilyn Cade Cc: 'Bruce Tonkin'; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004 This is a pretty serious topic, I agree, as another elected rep. I do not mind at all that we discuss this tomorrow. I would oppose though any attempt to rush anything through tomorrow. Be it dismissing the whole WIPO II request (which my constituency wouldn't mind as such) or taking some position. We need serious discussion about this topic, which cannot be accomplished in one teleconference as such short notice. I suggest we discuss WIPO II on this list before we make _any_ decision. Thanks. Marc Schneiders On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, at 19:52 [=GMT-0500], Marilyn Cade wrote:
Dear Bruce, As an elected rep to the BC on Council, I support the request for information and offer the following thought:
The working group on WIPO II did not achieve consensus. Changes in policy by ICANN require consensus In the BC, we have received inquiries from our members, regarding the action of the ICANN regarding this issue.
I want to support raisign this issue in Council to a priority level, and noting to the Board and staff that there is no support to make changes, given that there is no consensus in the working group.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss this within Council and will be on Thursday's call. I have to leave at 3:30 EST, so ask that this issue be raised between 2 and 3:00 p.m. so that I can help to address it.
Best regards,
Marilyn
I agree. The issue is important, and delicate. We should start discussing this matter before the conf. call. Kiyoshi I. Tsuru Bello, Guzmán, Morales y Tsuru, S.C. Agustín Manuel Chávez 1 - 104 Centro de Ciudad Santa Fe 01210, México, D.F. Tel. +52 (55) 5292-5232 Fax +52 (55) 5292-5233 www.bgmt.com.mx La información contenida en este mensaje de datos es confidencial, constituye un secreto industrial en términos de la legislación vigente y se encuentra dirigida exclusivamente al destinatario indicado en dicho mensaje. Si usted recibe esta información por error o si usted no es el destinatario del mensaje, favor de destruirlo inmediatamente, absteniéndose de leerlo, reproducirlo, transmitirlo, almacenarlo, divulgarlo, revelarlo o usarlo de manera directa o indirecta en cualquier forma y por cualquier medio. Muchas gracias. The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, privileged and intended for its recipient only. If you receive this mail by mistake and/or if you are not the recipient thereof, please destroy it immediately, abstaining yourself from reading, reproducing, transmitting, storing, disclosing, revealing or using it, either directly or indirectly, in any manner and by any means. Thank you very much. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marc Schneiders Sent: Miércoles, 17 de Noviembre de 2004 12:10 p.m. To: Marilyn Cade Cc: 'Bruce Tonkin'; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting Thursday 18 Nov 2004 This is a pretty serious topic, I agree, as another elected rep. I do not mind at all that we discuss this tomorrow. I would oppose though any attempt to rush anything through tomorrow. Be it dismissing the whole WIPO II request (which my constituency wouldn't mind as such) or taking some position. We need serious discussion about this topic, which cannot be accomplished in one teleconference as such short notice. I suggest we discuss WIPO II on this list before we make _any_ decision. Thanks. Marc Schneiders On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, at 19:52 [=GMT-0500], Marilyn Cade wrote:
Dear Bruce, As an elected rep to the BC on Council, I support the request for information and offer the following thought:
The working group on WIPO II did not achieve consensus. Changes in policy by ICANN require consensus In the BC, we have received inquiries from our members, regarding the action of the ICANN regarding this issue.
I want to support raisign this issue in Council to a priority level, and noting to the Board and staff that there is no support to make changes, given that there is no consensus in the working group.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss this within Council and will be on Thursday's call. I have to leave at 3:30 EST, so ask that this issue be raised between 2 and 3:00 p.m. so that I can help to address it.
Best regards,
Marilyn
I fully agree with Marc. --c.a. Marc Schneiders wrote:
This is a pretty serious topic, I agree, as another elected rep. I do not mind at all that we discuss this tomorrow. I would oppose though any attempt to rush anything through tomorrow. Be it dismissing the whole WIPO II request (which my constituency wouldn't mind as such) or taking some position. We need serious discussion about this topic, which cannot be accomplished in one teleconference as such short notice. I suggest we discuss WIPO II on this list before we make _any_ decision. Thanks.
Marc Schneiders
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, at 19:52 [=GMT-0500], Marilyn Cade wrote:
Dear Bruce, As an elected rep to the BC on Council, I support the request for information and offer the following thought:
The working group on WIPO II did not achieve consensus. Changes in policy by ICANN require consensus In the BC, we have received inquiries from our members, regarding the action of the ICANN regarding this issue.
I want to support raisign this issue in Council to a priority level, and noting to the Board and staff that there is no support to make changes, given that there is no consensus in the working group.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss this within Council and will be on Thursday's call. I have to leave at 3:30 EST, so ask that this issue be raised between 2 and 3:00 p.m. so that I can help to address it.
Best regards,
Marilyn
-- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Carlos Afonso diretor de planejamento Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor - Rits Rua Guilhermina Guinle, 272, 6º andar - Botafogo Rio de Janeiro RJ - Brasil CEP 22270-060 tel +55-21-2527-5494 fax +55-21-2527-5460 ca@rits.org.br http://www.rits.org.br ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
participants (6)
-
Bruce Tonkin -
Carlos Afonso -
Kiyoshi I. Tsuru -
Marc Schneiders -
Marilyn Cade -
Michael D. Palage