Agree. Unfortunately, I may not be able to attend this lunch meeting, but this is the first topic that would make me truly regret it. Tim

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@cctld.ru> Date: Sun, March 13, 2011 1:38 pm To: "'Stéphane Van Gelder'" <stephane.vangelder@indom.com>, <council@gnso.icann.org>

Yet another topic that might be interesting for discussion: should we exchange ideas regarding NTIA notice of inquiry on the IANA functions? Retirement of the tlds?   --andrei   From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 7:28 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

  All,  

As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris Disspain.

 

Thanks,

  Stéphane

 

 

  Début du message réexpédié :

De : Stéphane Van Gelder

Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC

À : Chris Disspain

Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow

  Chris,  

The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow.

 

We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO.

 

Stéphane

 

 

- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work.

- What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)?

- Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value?

- There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs?

- Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?