Add .ly Jaime Wagner <mailto:jaime@powerself.com.br> jaime@powerself.com.br Direto (51) 3219-5955 Cel (51) 8126-0916 Geral (51) 3233-3551 DDG: 0800-703-6366 <http://www.powerself.com.br/> www.powerself.com.br De: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de john@crediblecontext.com Enviada em: sábado, 12 de março de 2011 21:46 Para: Andrei Kolesnikov Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; 'Stéphane_Van_Gelder' Assunto: RE: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO Just the normal run. .co, .me, .tv., .la, etc. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" < <mailto:andrei@cctld.ru> andrei@cctld.ru> Date: Sat, March 12, 2011 4:43 pm To: < <mailto:john@crediblecontext.com> john@crediblecontext.com>, "'Stéphane_Van_Gelder'" < <http://stephane.vangelder@indom.com%3e> stephane.vangelder@indom.com>; Cc: < <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> council@gnso.icann.org> what TLD you are talking about? lets be more specific. ---andrei From: <mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> owner-council@gnso.icann.org [ <mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of <mailto:john@crediblecontext.com> john@crediblecontext.com Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 3:00 AM To: Stéphane_Van_Gelder Cc: <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> council@gnso.icann.org GNSO Subject: RE: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO One thing I have long wondered is why a ccTLD that is redelegated to commercial purpose is still managed under cover of ccTLD rules. I suspect there is an onion-like history to the matter, but I wonder if the number of such switches is going to accelerate. I have to imagine the public discussion over new gTLDs is giving a lot of CCTLD registries encouragement to draft the market motion. I guess my question is: Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose will accelerate? Cheers, Berard -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder < <http://stephane.vangelder@indom.com%3e> stephane.vangelder@indom.com>; Date: Sat, March 12, 2011 2:47 pm To: " <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> council@gnso.icann.org GNSO" < <mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> council@gnso.icann.org> Here are the questions I wrote down during our meeting today. These were done on the fly some will obviously need some work. Please correct/amend/refine as necessary. There is some urgency for the GAC questions as that is tomorrow and it would be good if we could some questions to the GAC asap. Thanks, Stéphane For the ccNSO - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? - How to deal with CWGs and should the recommendations For the GAC - Do we want to have a formal group formed between GAC and GNSO to discuss and - Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ? - CWGs, what is the GAC's view on these and how should their recommendations be processed?