Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP
Hi all, Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board's 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans. I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go. I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday. Thanks for your attention! Best, Keith
Many thanks Keith; this is OK with the BC. Best Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Drazek, Keith via council Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP Hi all, Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board's 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans. I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go. I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday. Thanks for your attention! Best, Keith
While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible. Best wishes, Ayden ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans.
I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go.
I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday.
Thanks for your attention!
Best, Keith
Hi Ayden, Thanks for your reply. I share your concerns and expect the Council will need to get involved later this month if/when it becomes apparent the EPDP WG will not meet the projected timeline. To that end, we all need to be working with our respective SGs and Cs to prepare for a “Plan B” discussion during our F2F in Los Angeles. In the interest of time, those conversations should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act expeditiously and won’t be able to wait until the late-February Council meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary. Regards, Keith From: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:46 AM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible. Best wishes, Ayden ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Hi all, Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans. I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go. I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday. Thanks for your attention! Best, Keith
Keith, Can you share a redlined version? I'm having trouble locating the prior draft that I thought was approved (and sent, honestly). Thanks, Darcy On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:45 AM Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi Ayden,
Thanks for your reply. I share your concerns and expect the Council will need to get involved later this month if/when it becomes apparent the EPDP WG will not meet the projected timeline. To that end, we all need to be working with our respective SGs and Cs to prepare for a “Plan B” discussion during our F2F in Los Angeles. In the interest of time, those conversations should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act expeditiously and won’t be able to wait until the late-February Council meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary.
Regards,
Keith
*From:* Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> *Sent:* Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:46 AM *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> *Cc:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP
While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible.
Best wishes, Ayden
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans.
I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go.
I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday.
Thanks for your attention!
Best,
Keith
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Hi Darcy, all, Sure thing. Redline is attached. Thanks, Keith From: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:45 AM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> Cc: icann@ferdeline.com; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP Keith, Can you share a redlined version? I'm having trouble locating the prior draft that I thought was approved (and sent, honestly). Thanks, Darcy On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:45 AM Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Hi Ayden, Thanks for your reply. I share your concerns and expect the Council will need to get involved later this month if/when it becomes apparent the EPDP WG will not meet the projected timeline. To that end, we all need to be working with our respective SGs and Cs to prepare for a “Plan B” discussion during our F2F in Los Angeles. In the interest of time, those conversations should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act expeditiously and won’t be able to wait until the late-February Council meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary. Regards, Keith From: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:46 AM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible. Best wishes, Ayden ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Hi all, Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans. I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go. I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday. Thanks for your attention! Best, Keith _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Hi Keith and all, May I suggest a tiny factual correction. The letter says the F2F takes place in Toronto on 14-16 January (?), but I think it’s 16-18 January. Thanks! Tanya On Thu 10. Jan 2019 at 17:59, Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi Darcy, all,
Sure thing. Redline is attached.
Thanks,
Keith
*From:* Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com> *Sent:* Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:45 AM *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> *Cc:* icann@ferdeline.com; council@gnso.icann.org
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP
Keith, Can you share a redlined version? I'm having trouble locating the prior draft that I thought was approved (and sent, honestly).
Thanks,
Darcy
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:45 AM Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi Ayden,
Thanks for your reply. I share your concerns and expect the Council will need to get involved later this month if/when it becomes apparent the EPDP WG will not meet the projected timeline. To that end, we all need to be working with our respective SGs and Cs to prepare for a “Plan B” discussion during our F2F in Los Angeles. In the interest of time, those conversations should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act expeditiously and won’t be able to wait until the late-February Council meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary.
Regards,
Keith
*From:* Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> *Sent:* Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:46 AM *To:* Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> *Cc:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP
While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible.
Best wishes, Ayden
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi all,
Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans.
I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go.
I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday.
Thanks for your attention!
Best,
Keith
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Thanks Tanya! I made the correction. Best, Keith From: Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:16 PM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; darcy.southwell@endurance.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP Hi Keith and all, May I suggest a tiny factual correction. The letter says the F2F takes place in Toronto on 14-16 January (?), but I think it’s 16-18 January. Thanks! Tanya On Thu 10. Jan 2019 at 17:59, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Hi Darcy, all, Sure thing. Redline is attached. Thanks, Keith From: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com<mailto:darcy.southwell@endurance.com>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 11:45 AM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>> Cc: icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>; council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP Keith, Can you share a redlined version? I'm having trouble locating the prior draft that I thought was approved (and sent, honestly). Thanks, Darcy On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:45 AM Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Hi Ayden, Thanks for your reply. I share your concerns and expect the Council will need to get involved later this month if/when it becomes apparent the EPDP WG will not meet the projected timeline. To that end, we all need to be working with our respective SGs and Cs to prepare for a “Plan B” discussion during our F2F in Los Angeles. In the interest of time, those conversations should be happening now, and over the next two weeks, so our Council-level discussion is appropriately informed by SG/C views. We will need to act expeditiously and won’t be able to wait until the late-February Council meeting if a course-correction or temporary alternative path is necessary. Regards, Keith From: Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com<mailto:icann@ferdeline.com>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:46 AM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [council] Last Call -- Draft GNSO Response to ICANN Board on EPDP While I have no objections to the letter being sent, I do think this letter paints a very rosy picture of the progress that the EPDP Team has made, and I worry that there is the potential for the Council to suffer embarrassment in the future if the EPDP Team is not successful in meeting its work plan. I happen to think that is probable, not possible. Best wishes, Ayden ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:02 PM, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Hi all, Attached is an updated draft GNSO Council response to the ICANN Board’s 14 November letter concerning the EPDP, and specifically requesting an update on possible back-up plans. I previously circulated a draft on 26 December and received one request to avoid enumerating any specific back-up plan considerations. I have removed those in the attached letter, other than where we refer to the EPDP Initial Report language. I also added some other general text. Rafik, Pam and I are all in agreement this letter is ready to go. I plan to send this before the end of the week to ensure it is received before the EPDP WG meets F2F next week. We are late in our response to Cherine and the Board, so please review this ASAP. I will send COB Thursday. Thanks for your attention! Best, Keith _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
participants (5)
-
Ayden Férdeline -
Darcy Southwell -
Drazek, Keith -
Marie Pattullo -
Tatiana Tropina