James, Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news. Best, Paul Sent from my iPhone
This is an important point for NCSG councillors that presented statements too. Thanks for raising this point, Paul. Best regards, Marília On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
James,
Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news.
Best, Paul
Sent from my iPhone
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/011 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of attachments that have been provided. Best regards, Marika On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Paul McGrady" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
James,
Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news.
Best, Paul
Sent from my iPhone
Thanks, Marika. If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission to NTIA. Is this correct? If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas. And I presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to the folks at NTIA. Thank you, J. On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Marika Konings" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/01 1 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of attachments that have been provided.
Best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Paul McGrady" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
James,
Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news.
Best, Paul
Sent from my iPhone
To your first question, yes, I believe that is correct. Best regards, Marika On 14/03/16 13:57, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of James M. Bladel" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of jbladel@godaddy.com> wrote:
Thanks, Marika.
If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission to NTIA. Is this correct?
If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas. And I presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to the folks at NTIA.
Thank you,
J.
On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Marika Konings" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/0 1 1 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of attachments that have been provided.
Best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Paul McGrady" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
James,
Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news.
Best, Paul
Sent from my iPhone
Dear James and Marika, Thank you for the clarifications. Did we receive a clarification from Thomas? Best wishes, Marília On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
To your first question, yes, I believe that is correct.
Best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/16 13:57, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of James M. Bladel" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of jbladel@godaddy.com> wrote:
Thanks, Marika.
If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission to NTIA. Is this correct?
If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas. And I presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to the folks at NTIA.
Thank you,
J.
On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Marika Konings" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/0
1 1 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of attachments that have been provided.
Best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Paul McGrady" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
James,
Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news.
Best, Paul
Sent from my iPhone
-- *Marília Maciel* Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
Please find the response from Thomas attached. It may not have gotten to the Council list as I was not able to find it back in the archives (I suspect that Thomas may no longer have posting rights?). Best regards, Marika From: Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@gmail.com<mailto:mariliamaciel@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday 16 March 2016 at 14:00 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Cc: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>, Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com<mailto:policy@paulmcgrady.com>>, "GNSO Council List (council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>)" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements Dear James and Marika, Thank you for the clarifications. Did we receive a clarification from Thomas? Best wishes, Marília On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote: To your first question, yes, I believe that is correct. Best regards, Marika On 14/03/16 13:57, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of James M. Bladel" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>> wrote:
Thanks, Marika.
If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, and these were references in their submission to the Board...but we have no confirmation that the Board included these materials in their submission to NTIA. Is this correct?
If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas. And I presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly to the folks at NTIA.
Thank you,
J.
On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote:
Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal message from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a link to the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/0 1 1 720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not seem to include the details of the consideration by the different chartering organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a number of attachments that have been provided.
Best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Paul McGrady" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of policy@paulmcgrady.com<mailto:policy@paulmcgrady.com>> wrote:
James,
Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has passed them along to the NTIA? These are an important part of the record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking and getting back to the List with news.
Best, Paul
Sent from my iPhone
-- Marília Maciel Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu<http://www.diplomacy.edu> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/ Subscribe "Digital Rights: Latin America & the Caribbean" - http://www.digitalrightslac.net/en
participants (4)
-
James M. Bladel -
Marika Konings -
Marilia Maciel -
Paul McGrady