Re: [council] For your review - Final EPDP Report AND Council Motion
Hi all, Following up Marika’s note forwarding the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report, I have attached a slightly updated version of the draft motion for our consideration during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting. I happily second this motion put forward by Rafik, and I look forward to our discussion and possible vote tomorrow. As I have described previously, the motion includes approval of the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report AND Council non-objection to the initiation of Phase 2. Note that a deferral of tomorrow’s vote to 4 March, as requested today by Marie, would delay initiation of Phase 2 by a commensurate period, i.e. 10 days. Please review the attached motion before tomorrow’s meeting. Regards, Keith From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:57 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Cc: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Final EPDP Report Dear Councilors, As Rafik is traveling and in the interest of time, we are hereby sending you the EPDP Team’s Final Report. Per a request from last week’s Council meeting, we are attaching two versions of the report: (1) a clean version and (2) a red-lined version, which highlights the changes from the draft final report that was sent last week. As you review the Final Report, we would like to highlight the main updates made since the last version: 1. The chair has included the consensus designations in the body of the Report. You may also review the table of consensus designations in Annex E of the Final Report. 2. The following recommendations have been edited for clarification: a. Recommendation 6 - registrars may allow registered name holders to consent to publish redacted data elements b. Recommendation 7 – the first table has been deleted in order to clarify which data elements are optional for registries to transfer to registrars c. Recommendation 9 – the language was been edited slightly to note that Contractual Compliance may request registration data elements under the Purpose 5 table, but the requests will be narrowly-tailored and fit for purpose d. Recommendation 11 – the Team notes it is expecting additional legal guidance with respect to the city field, and, accordingly, this recommendation may be revisited in Phase 2 of the Team’s work e. Recommendation 12 – the text has been altered to note that publication of the Organization field is a requirement for registrars, not registries. Additionally, registrars must phase into this treatment of the Org field by no later than 29 February 2019. f. Recommendation 14 – a note was added to that PPSAI is currently in implementation and it will be important to understand the interplay b/w this recommendation and the PPSAI IRT’s work. Further work may be considered in Phase 2. g. Recommendation 15 – the data retention period has been changed to 15 months h. Recommendation 17 – text edited for clarity i. Recommendation 18 – the text has been clarified to note that registrars and registries must reasonably consider and accommodate requests for lawful disclosure and reasonable requests for disclosure must be responded to within 30 days 3. Group statements, the Minority Statement and responses to Consensus calls were submitted during the week prior to the close of deliberations. Issues raised in those submissions regarding Final Report inconsistencies, errors, and vagueness (as well as several substantive amendments) were discussed following receipt of the reports and amendments were made where the group agreed with those requested edits. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>.
Hi Keith, thanks for seconding the motion, I accept those edits as friendly amendments. Best Regards, Rafik Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 06:29, Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> a écrit :
Hi all,
Following up Marika’s note forwarding the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report, I have attached a slightly updated version of the draft motion for our consideration during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting. I happily second this motion put forward by Rafik, and I look forward to our discussion and possible vote tomorrow.
As I have described previously, the motion includes approval of the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report AND Council non-objection to the initiation of Phase 2. Note that a deferral of tomorrow’s vote to 4 March, as requested today by Marie, would delay initiation of Phase 2 by a commensurate period, i.e. 10 days.
Please review the attached motion before tomorrow’s meeting.
Regards,
Keith
*From:* Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:57 PM *To:* council@gnso.icann.org *Cc:* gnso-epdp-team@icann.org *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Final EPDP Report
Dear Councilors,
As Rafik is traveling and in the interest of time, we are hereby sending you the EPDP Team’s Final Report. Per a request from last week’s Council meeting, we are attaching two versions of the report: (1) a clean version and (2) a red-lined version, which highlights the changes from the draft final report that was sent last week.
As you review the Final Report, we would like to highlight the main updates made since the last version:
1. The chair has included the consensus designations in the body of the Report. You may also review the table of consensus designations in Annex E of the Final Report. 2. The following recommendations have been edited for clarification: 1. *Recommendation 6* - registrars may allow registered name holders to consent to publish redacted data elements 2. *Recommendation 7 *– the first table has been deleted in order to clarify which data elements are optional for registries to transfer to registrars 3. *Recommendation 9 *– the language was been edited slightly to note that Contractual Compliance may request registration data elements under the Purpose 5 table, but the requests will be narrowly-tailored and fit for purpose 4. *Recommendation 11* – the Team notes it is expecting additional legal guidance with respect to the city field, and, accordingly, this recommendation may be revisited in Phase 2 of the Team’s work 5. *Recommendation 12 *– the text has been altered to note that publication of the Organization field is a requirement for registrars, not registries. Additionally, registrars must phase into this treatment of the Org field by no later than 29 February 2019. 6. *Recommendation 14 *– a note was added to that PPSAI is currently in implementation and it will be important to understand the interplay b/w this recommendation and the PPSAI IRT’s work. Further work may be considered in Phase 2. 7. *Recommendation 15* – the data retention period has been changed to 15 months 8. *Recommendation 17 *– text edited for clarity 9. *Recommendation 18* – the text has been clarified to note that registrars and registries must reasonably consider and accommodate requests for lawful disclosure and reasonable requests for disclosure must be responded to within 30 days 3. Group statements, the Minority Statement and responses to Consensus calls were submitted during the week prior to the close of deliberations. Issues raised in those submissions regarding Final Report inconsistencies, errors, and vagueness (as well as several substantive amendments) were discussed following receipt of the reports and amendments were made where the group agreed with those requested edits.
Best regards,
Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Hi all, If it is still possible to accept edits, I have a very small requested amendment to bullet six: The EPDP Team was formed and held its first meeting on 1 August 2018, followed by the publication of the Charter-required “Triage” Report on 15 September 2018, and its Initial Report on 21 November; The edit is the addition of the word "and" as it improves readability of the sentence. I also suggest the insertion of a comma (',') between "members alternates" in the fourth resolve clause, i.e. "The GNSO Council extends its sincere appreciation to the members, alternates and support staff of the EPDP Team for their tireless efforts to complete Phase 1 in the timeline available." Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 10:39 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Keith,
thanks for seconding the motion, I accept those edits as friendly amendments.
Best Regards,
Rafik
Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 06:29, Drazek, Keith via council <council@gnso.icann.org> a écrit :
Hi all,
Following up Marika’s note forwarding the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report, I have attached a slightly updated version of the draft motion for our consideration during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting. I happily second this motion put forward by Rafik, and I look forward to our discussion and possible vote tomorrow.
As I have described previously, the motion includes approval of the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report AND Council non-objection to the initiation of Phase 2. Note that a deferral of tomorrow’s vote to 4 March, as requested today by Marie, would delay initiation of Phase 2 by a commensurate period, i.e. 10 days.
Please review the attached motion before tomorrow’s meeting.
Regards,
Keith
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:57 PM To: council@gnso.icann.org Cc: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Final EPDP Report
Dear Councilors,
As Rafik is traveling and in the interest of time, we are hereby sending you the EPDP Team’s Final Report. Per a request from last week’s Council meeting, we are attaching two versions of the report: (1) a clean version and (2) a red-lined version, which highlights the changes from the draft final report that was sent last week.
As you review the Final Report, we would like to highlight the main updates made since the last version:
- The chair has included the consensus designations in the body of the Report. You may also review the table of consensus designations in Annex E of the Final Report.
- The following recommendations have been edited for clarification:
- Recommendation 6 - registrars may allow registered name holders to consent to publish redacted data elements
- Recommendation 7 – the first table has been deleted in order to clarify which data elements are optional for registries to transfer to registrars
- Recommendation 9 – the language was been edited slightly to note that Contractual Compliance may request registration data elements under the Purpose 5 table, but the requests will be narrowly-tailored and fit for purpose
- Recommendation 11 – the Team notes it is expecting additional legal guidance with respect to the city field, and, accordingly, this recommendation may be revisited in Phase 2 of the Team’s work
- Recommendation 12 – the text has been altered to note that publication of the Organization field is a requirement for registrars, not registries. Additionally, registrars must phase into this treatment of the Org field by no later than 29 February 2019.
- Recommendation 14 – a note was added to that PPSAI is currently in implementation and it will be important to understand the interplay b/w this recommendation and the PPSAI IRT’s work. Further work may be considered in Phase 2.
- Recommendation 15 – the data retention period has been changed to 15 months
- Recommendation 17 – text edited for clarity
- Recommendation 18 – the text has been clarified to note that registrars and registries must reasonably consider and accommodate requests for lawful disclosure and reasonable requests for disclosure must be responded to within 30 days
- Group statements, the Minority Statement and responses to Consensus calls were submitted during the week prior to the close of deliberations. Issues raised in those submissions regarding Final Report inconsistencies, errors, and vagueness (as well as several substantive amendments) were discussed following receipt of the reports and amendments were made where the group agreed with those requested edits.
Best regards,
Marika
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our [interactive courses](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...) and visiting the [GNSO Newcomer pages](https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...).
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
Hi, I accept those friendly amendments. Best, Rafik Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 11:35, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com> a écrit :
Hi all,
If it is still possible to accept edits, I have a very small requested amendment to bullet six:
*The EPDP Team was formed and held its first meeting on 1 August 2018, followed by the publication of the Charter-required “Triage” Report on 15 September 2018, **and** its Initial Report on 21 November;*
The edit is the addition of the word "and" as it improves readability of the sentence.
I also suggest the insertion of a comma (',') between "members alternates" in the fourth resolve clause, i.e. *"The GNSO Council extends its sincere appreciation to the members**,** alternates and support staff of the EPDP Team for their tireless efforts to complete Phase 1 in the timeline available."*
Best wishes,
Ayden Férdeline
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 10:39 PM, Rafik Dammak < rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Keith,
thanks for seconding the motion, I accept those edits as friendly amendments.
Best Regards,
Rafik
Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 06:29, Drazek, Keith via council < council@gnso.icann.org> a écrit :
Hi all,
Following up Marika’s note forwarding the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report, I have attached a slightly updated version of the draft motion for our consideration during tomorrow’s GNSO Council meeting. I happily second this motion put forward by Rafik, and I look forward to our discussion and possible vote tomorrow.
As I have described previously, the motion includes approval of the EPDP WG Phase One Final Report AND Council non-objection to the initiation of Phase 2. Note that a deferral of tomorrow’s vote to 4 March, as requested today by Marie, would delay initiation of Phase 2 by a commensurate period, i.e. 10 days.
Please review the attached motion before tomorrow’s meeting.
Regards,
Keith
*From:* Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:57 PM *To:* council@gnso.icann.org *Cc:* gnso-epdp-team@icann.org *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Final EPDP Report
Dear Councilors,
As Rafik is traveling and in the interest of time, we are hereby sending you the EPDP Team’s Final Report. Per a request from last week’s Council meeting, we are attaching two versions of the report: (1) a clean version and (2) a red-lined version, which highlights the changes from the draft final report that was sent last week.
As you review the Final Report, we would like to highlight the main updates made since the last version:
1. The chair has included the consensus designations in the body of the Report. You may also review the table of consensus designations in Annex E of the Final Report. 2. The following recommendations have been edited for clarification: 1. *Recommendation 6* - registrars may allow registered name holders to consent to publish redacted data elements 2. *Recommendation 7 *– the first table has been deleted in order to clarify which data elements are optional for registries to transfer to registrars 3. *Recommendation 9 *– the language was been edited slightly to note that Contractual Compliance may request registration data elements under the Purpose 5 table, but the requests will be narrowly-tailored and fit for purpose 4. *Recommendation 11* – the Team notes it is expecting additional legal guidance with respect to the city field, and, accordingly, this recommendation may be revisited in Phase 2 of the Team’s work 5. *Recommendation 12 *– the text has been altered to note that publication of the Organization field is a requirement for registrars, not registries. Additionally, registrars must phase into this treatment of the Org field by no later than 29 February 2019. 6. *Recommendation 14 *– a note was added to that PPSAI is currently in implementation and it will be important to understand the interplay b/w this recommendation and the PPSAI IRT’s work. Further work may be considered in Phase 2. 7. *Recommendation 15* – the data retention period has been changed to 15 months 8. *Recommendation 17 *– text edited for clarity 9. *Recommendation 18* – the text has been clarified to note that registrars and registries must reasonably consider and accommodate requests for lawful disclosure and reasonable requests for disclosure must be responded to within 30 days 3. Group statements, the Minority Statement and responses to Consensus calls were submitted during the week prior to the close of deliberations. Issues raised in those submissions regarding Final Report inconsistencies, errors, and vagueness (as well as several substantive amendments) were discussed following receipt of the reports and amendments were made where the group agreed with those requested edits.
Best regards,
Marika
*Marika Konings*
*Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
*Email: marika.konings@icann.org <marika.konings@icann.org> *
*Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
*Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. *
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
participants (3)
-
Ayden Férdeline -
Drazek, Keith -
Rafik Dammak