amendments to original JAS motion
Hello, I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill: I would like propose changing: a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set " c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment. d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance. e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods" g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices" h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." Regards Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
h) is interesting Rafik. Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak Sent: Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM To: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: [council] amendments to original JAS motion Hello, I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill: I would like propose changing: a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set " c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment. d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance. e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods" g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices" h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." Regards Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
Hi Adrian, always happy to amuse you and let you enjoying reading motions ... but you should check more carefully next time, you will find the rationale was to correct a typo ;) Rafik 2011/1/7 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au>
h) is interesting Rafik.
*Adrian Kinderis*
*From:* owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak *Sent:* Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM *To:* Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry *Subject:* [council] amendments to original JAS motion
Hello,
I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:
I would like propose changing:
a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need."
b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set "
c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment.
d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance.
e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods
f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods"
g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices"
h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance."
with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance."
Regards
Rafik Dammak
Twitter: @rafik
Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
Right you are Rafik. My sincerest of apologies to you. Clearly I don’t read motions closely enough. You be interested to know that I actually don’t read yours for amusement, I save that for anything that Stephane produces. Thanks for letting me read them though. I appreciate it. Look forward to voting on your motion. Adrian Kinderis From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 7 January 2011 10:47 AM To: Adrian Kinderis Cc: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: Re: [council] amendments to original JAS motion Hi Adrian, always happy to amuse you and let you enjoying reading motions ... but you should check more carefully next time, you will find the rationale was to correct a typo ;) Rafik 2011/1/7 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@ausregistry.com.au<mailto:adrian@ausregistry.com.au>> h) is interesting Rafik. Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak Sent: Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM To: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: [council] amendments to original JAS motion Hello, I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill: I would like propose changing: a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set " c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment. d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance. e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods" g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices" h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." Regards Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
Thanks Rafik. Bill, do you accept those amendments as friendly? Glen, if Bill does, please update the motion with the amendments on the wiki. If Bill does not, please add the amendments as separate items below the motion. Thanks, Stéphane Le 6 janv. 2011 à 21:44, Rafik Dammak a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:
I would like propose changing:
a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need."
b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set "
c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment.
d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance.
e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods
f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods"
g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices"
h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance."
Regards
Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
Hi On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Rafik.
Bill, do you accept those amendments as friendly?
Yes Thanks, Bill
Glen, if Bill does, please update the motion with the amendments on the wiki. If Bill does not, please add the amendments as separate items below the motion.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 6 janv. 2011 à 21:44, Rafik Dammak a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:
I would like propose changing:
a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need."
b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set "
c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment.
d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance.
e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods
f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods"
g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices"
h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance."
Regards
Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************************
Thank you Bill. Glen, please list only the amended version of the motion on the wiki, as these amendments have now been accepted as friendly. Thanks you. Stéphane Le 9 janv. 2011 à 12:19, Drake William a écrit :
Hi
On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Thanks Rafik.
Bill, do you accept those amendments as friendly?
Yes
Thanks,
Bill
Glen, if Bill does, please update the motion with the amendments on the wiki. If Bill does not, please add the amendments as separate items below the motion.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 6 janv. 2011 à 21:44, Rafik Dammak a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:
I would like propose changing:
a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need."
b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set "
c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment.
d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance.
e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods
f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods"
g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices"
h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance."
Regards
Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
*********************************************************** William J. Drake Senior Associate Centre for International Governance Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva, Switzerland william.drake@graduateinstitute.ch www.williamdrake.org ***********************************************************
participants (4)
-
Adrian Kinderis -
Drake William -
Rafik Dammak -
Stéphane Van Gelder