h) is interesting Rafik. Adrian Kinderis From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak Sent: Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM To: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: [council] amendments to original JAS motion Hello, I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill: I would like propose changing: a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a method of demonstrating that need." b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set " c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective (a) of this charter amendment. d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance. e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods" g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and practices" h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants meeting the requirements for assistance." Regards Rafik Dammak Twitter: @rafik Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak