Hello All, A few comments have arisen this week that there is no ability for some users to participate in the GNSO policy development process. There are two aspects: (1) Providing input and becoming involved in discussions on a topic (2) Having a vote on the Council (or task forces) with respect to approving any recommendations I think we need to give consideration to (1) for how to better facilitate input and discussions. The GNSO public forums have been one initiative in recent meetings to encourage more participation. Up-to-date our main approach has been to involve ALAC liaisons at the Council and in task forces, and rely on public comments submitted to the ICANN website after a formal call for comments. With respect to (2) there is a documented mechanism in the ICANN bylaws where any group can request the creation of a constituency. The relevant quotes from the ICANN bylaws are: "...self-organized Constituencies are hereby recognized as representative of a specific and significant group of stakeholders" "Each Constituency ...... shall maintain its recognition, and thus its ability to select GNSO Council representatives, only so long as it in fact represents the interests globally of the stakeholder communities it purports to represent, and shall operate to the maximum extent feasible in an open and transparent manner and consistent with procedures designed to ensure fairness. No individual or entity shall be excluded from participation in a Constituency merely because of participation in another Constituency. " "Any group of individuals or entities may petition the Board for recognition as a new or separate Constituency. Any such petition shall contain a detailed explanation of: a. Why the addition of such a Constituency will improve the ability of the GNSO to carry out its policy-development responsibilities; and b. Why the proposed new Constituency would adequately represent, on a global basis, the stakeholders it seeks to represent. Any petition for the recognition of a new Constituency shall be posted for public comment. " Regards, Bruce Tonkin