RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
Dear Jonathan: I wish to offer the following amendment, on behalf of the IPC, to the first motion on our agenda-namely the motion to initiate a PDP on access to curative rights protection mechanisms. The GNSO Council hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate: (i) whether the UDRP and/or URS should be amended (to enable their access and use by IGOs and INGOs whose identifiers had been recommended for protection by the IGO-INGO PDP WG); and (ii) if so, in what way;, or (ii) whether a separate narrowly-tailored procedure modeled on these curative rights protection measures to apply only to protected IGO and INGO identifiers should be developed. I would ask that the Council also consider implementing a similar amendment within the PDP WG Charter itself. I do hope that these minor changes will be accepted as friendly, as their primary goal is to align the language more closely with the recommendation in the final issues report (which follows) and delineate two clear options. Staff therefore recommends that the GNSO Council commence a PDP on the specific issue described in this Issue Report, i.e. exploring whether the UDRP and URS should be amended, and if so in what way; or whether a separate narrowly tailored procedure designed, to enable curative protection for IGOs and INGOs should be developed. In short, as it stands, I think the semicolon and numeral (ii) are slightly out of place, and might confuse two otherwise very clear options for the WG to consider. I look forward to discussing this suggested amendment with everyone on our call. Thank you, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/> ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn> Behalf OfGlen de Saint Géry Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:11:48 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>; council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council The motions have been posted on page : https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+5+June+2014 Thank you. Kind regards, Glen From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: mardi 27 mai 2014 00:55 To: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council Importance: High All, Please see attached for two proposed motions for the next council meeting. Ordinarily, I expect that these would have come to you from Thomas Rickert as chair of the PDP WG that developed the recommendation for the Issue Report. However, since Thomas is currently on vacation, I have decided to propose the motions. Thanks, Jonathan =========================================================== CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================
Thank-you Brian, These seem reasonable to me. Hopefully to Thomas as well. Jonathan From: Winterfeldt, Brian J. [mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com] Sent: 05 June 2014 13:38 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council Dear Jonathan: I wish to offer the following amendment, on behalf of the IPC, to the first motion on our agendanamely the motion to initiate a PDP on access to curative rights protection mechanisms. The GNSO Council hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate: (i) whether the UDRP and/or URS should be amended (to enable their access and use by IGOs and INGOs whose identifiers had been recommended for protection by the IGO-INGO PDP WG); and (ii) if so, in what way;, or (ii) whether a separate narrowly-tailored procedure modeled on these curative rights protection measures to apply only to protected IGO and INGO identifiers should be developed. I would ask that the Council also consider implementing a similar amendment within the PDP WG Charter itself. I do hope that these minor changes will be accepted as friendly, as their primary goal is to align the language more closely with the recommendation in the final issues report (which follows) and delineate two clear options. Staff therefore recommends that the GNSO Council commence a PDP on the specific issue described in this Issue Report, i.e. exploring whether the UDRP and URS should be amended, and if so in what way; or whether a separate narrowly tailored procedure designed, to enable curative protection for IGOs and INGOs should be developed. In short, as it stands, I think the semicolon and numeral (ii) are slightly out of place, and might confuse two otherwise very clear options for the WG to consider. I look forward to discussing this suggested amendment with everyone on our call. Thank you, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com / www.kattenlaw.com <http://www.kattenlaw.com/> _____ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn Behalf OfGlen de Saint Géry Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:11:48 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council The motions have been posted on page : https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+5+June+2014 Thank you. Kind regards, Glen From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: mardi 27 mai 2014 00:55 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council Importance: High All, Please see attached for two proposed motions for the next council meeting. Ordinarily, I expect that these would have come to you from Thomas Rickert as chair of the PDP WG that developed the recommendation for the Issue Report. However, since Thomas is currently on vacation, I have decided to propose the motions. Thanks, Jonathan =========================================================== CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================
Jonathan, I am ok with these changes as well. Thanks, Thomas Am 05.06.2014 um 17:29 schrieb Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info>:
Thank-you Brian,
These seem reasonable to me.
Hopefully to Thomas as well.
Jonathan
From: Winterfeldt, Brian J. [mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com] Sent: 05 June 2014 13:38 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
Dear Jonathan:
I wish to offer the following amendment, on behalf of the IPC, to the first motion on our agenda—namely the motion to initiate a PDP on access to curative rights protection mechanisms.
The GNSO Council hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate: (i) whether the UDRP and/or URS should be amended (to enable their access and use by IGOs and INGOs whose identifiers had been recommended for protection by the IGO-INGO PDP WG); and (ii) if so, in what way;, or (ii) whether a separate narrowly-tailored procedure modeled on these curative rights protection measures to apply only to protected IGO and INGO identifiers should be developed.
I would ask that the Council also consider implementing a similar amendment within the PDP WG Charter itself. I do hope that these minor changes will be accepted as friendly, as their primary goal is to align the language more closely with the recommendation in the final issues report (which follows) and delineate two clear options.
Staff therefore recommends that the GNSO Council commence a PDP on the specific issue described in this Issue Report, i.e. exploring whether the UDRP and URS should be amended, and if so in what way; or whether a separate narrowly tailored procedure designed, to enable curative protection for IGOs and INGOs should be developed.
In short, as it stands, I think the semicolon and numeral (ii) are slightly out of place, and might confuse two otherwise very clear options for the WG to consider.
I look forward to discussing this suggested amendment with everyone on our call.
Thank you,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com / www.kattenlaw.com
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn Behalf OfGlen de Saint Géry Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:11:48 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
The motions have been posted on page : https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+5+June+2014
Thank you. Kind regards,
Glen
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: mardi 27 mai 2014 00:55 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council Importance: High
All,
Please see attached for two proposed motions for the next council meeting.
Ordinarily, I expect that these would have come to you from Thomas Rickert as chair of the PDP WG that developed the recommendation for the Issue Report.
However, since Thomas is currently on vacation, I have decided to propose the motions.
Thanks,
Jonathan =========================================================== CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================
participants (3)
-
Jonathan Robinson -
Thomas Rickert -
Winterfeldt, Brian J.