RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
And mine. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Issue #5 resolution From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Wed, February 13, 2008 6:19 am To: "Avri Doria" <avri@psg.com>, "Council GNSO" <council@gnso.icann.org> That is my understanding as well. Chuck Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com) -----Original Message----- From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@psg.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 06:48 AM Eastern Standard Time To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Issue #5 resolution Hi, I believe we have all accepted the rewrite of Executive summary #5 to read: We support efforts to determine the feasibility of an interim solution whereby a limited number of countries or territories designated in the ISO 3166-1 list that have special needs would be granted IDN labels in the near term provided that no IDN TLDs associated with countries or territories are introduced earlier than IDN gTLDs without prior community concurrence. does anyone disagree? a.
participants (1)
-
Tim Ruiz