Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover * GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?) Action Items: * GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
With regard to the ATRT2, I'd like to take Ray Plzak up on his suggestion to let Brian Cute know of the two or three areas (e.g., difficulty of consensus, length of PDP) that we'd like his committee to look at with specific regard to the Council. Berard --------- Original Message ---------Subject: [council] Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> Date: 4/10/13 6:49 pm To: "GNSO Council List" <council@gnso.icann.org> Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover * GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?) Action Items: * GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
I'd like to suggest an update to our working methods: Let's get reports or slide-decks in writing in advance and begin at least the weekend sessions by taking the reports as read, starting directly with questions. It felt as though we spent a long time hearing summaries of reports rather than discussing issues with or consensus around them. I know I for one process information more thoroughly and more quickly in writing. To aid that, can we ask for a set of links in one place (or even better, a single page HTML or PDF) containing everything we're expected to read, for advance printing/downloading. Thanks, --Wendy On 04/10/2013 09:49 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover
* GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?)
Action Items:
* GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
I think this is a very good idea. Regards, Osvaldo El 11/04/2013, a las 10:47, "Wendy Seltzer" <wendy@seltzer.com<mailto:wendy@seltzer.com>> escribió: I'd like to suggest an update to our working methods: Let's get reports or slide-decks in writing in advance and begin at least the weekend sessions by taking the reports as read, starting directly with questions. It felt as though we spent a long time hearing summaries of reports rather than discussing issues with or consensus around them. I know I for one process information more thoroughly and more quickly in writing. To aid that, can we ask for a set of links in one place (or even better, a single page HTML or PDF) containing everything we're expected to read, for advance printing/downloading. Thanks, --Wendy On 04/10/2013 09:49 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover
* GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?)
Action Items:
* GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
Good point, Wendy. However I'd like to take into consideration that the weekend sessions are GNSo sessions (not council only) including newcomers. We can't really expect all having dived into the reports in advance. Personally I appreciate a brief refreshment of my memory shortly before the discussion starts. Thanks Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM To: Jonathan Robinson Cc: GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up I'd like to suggest an update to our working methods: Let's get reports or slide-decks in writing in advance and begin at least the weekend sessions by taking the reports as read, starting directly with questions. It felt as though we spent a long time hearing summaries of reports rather than discussing issues with or consensus around them. I know I for one process information more thoroughly and more quickly in writing. To aid that, can we ask for a set of links in one place (or even better, a single page HTML or PDF) containing everything we're expected to read, for advance printing/downloading. Thanks, --Wendy On 04/10/2013 09:49 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover
* GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?)
Action Items:
* GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
I think for the benefit of our time during our public meetings, we could plan more carefully for the agenda by deciding whether or not a presentation is necessary in that session. For example, if there's been a) a presentation during the weekend session on an issue, and b) a work session on the same issue during the week, where likely the same data was given, perhaps we could request to dispense with another during our meeting. That doesn't entirely address Wolf's correct point -- just something to consider. Sent from my iPad On Apr 11, 2013, at 11:08 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
Good point, Wendy. However I'd like to take into consideration that the weekend sessions are GNSo sessions (not council only) including newcomers. We can't really expect all having dived into the reports in advance. Personally I appreciate a brief refreshment of my memory shortly before the discussion starts.
Thanks Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM To: Jonathan Robinson Cc: GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up
I'd like to suggest an update to our working methods: Let's get reports or slide-decks in writing in advance and begin at least the weekend sessions by taking the reports as read, starting directly with questions. It felt as though we spent a long time hearing summaries of reports rather than discussing issues with or consensus around them. I know I for one process information more thoroughly and more quickly in writing.
To aid that, can we ask for a set of links in one place (or even better, a single page HTML or PDF) containing everything we're expected to read, for advance printing/downloading.
Thanks, --Wendy
On 04/10/2013 09:49 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover
* GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?)
Action Items:
* GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
I'd be happy with some compromise here - a brief summary presentation would indeed be useful for a public meeting in many cases, and focus everyones attention on the most important issues with any given report. But absolutely, please, could we have all reports accompanied by some written documentation, and not feel that all the details need to be in a verbal presentation. If such written documentation was also available for download by interested observers, that would be fine. I frequently feel after receiving a verbal report that I would be better informed if I'd been able to spend the equivalent time reading about the issue. Regards David On 11/04/2013, at 11:08 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
Good point, Wendy. However I'd like to take into consideration that the weekend sessions are GNSo sessions (not council only) including newcomers. We can't really expect all having dived into the reports in advance. Personally I appreciate a brief refreshment of my memory shortly before the discussion starts.
Thanks Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM To: Jonathan Robinson Cc: GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up
I'd like to suggest an update to our working methods: Let's get reports or slide-decks in writing in advance and begin at least the weekend sessions by taking the reports as read, starting directly with questions. It felt as though we spent a long time hearing summaries of reports rather than discussing issues with or consensus around them. I know I for one process information more thoroughly and more quickly in writing.
To aid that, can we ask for a set of links in one place (or even better, a single page HTML or PDF) containing everything we're expected to read, for advance printing/downloading.
Thanks, --Wendy
On 04/10/2013 09:49 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover
* GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?)
Action Items:
* GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
Very good proposal, David. Documentation in advance is essential. Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: David Cake Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 11:34 AM To: WUKnoben Cc: Wendy Seltzer ; Jonathan Robinson ; GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up I'd be happy with some compromise here - a brief summary presentation would indeed be useful for a public meeting in many cases, and focus everyones attention on the most important issues with any given report. But absolutely, please, could we have all reports accompanied by some written documentation, and not feel that all the details need to be in a verbal presentation. If such written documentation was also available for download by interested observers, that would be fine. I frequently feel after receiving a verbal report that I would be better informed if I'd been able to spend the equivalent time reading about the issue. Regards David On 11/04/2013, at 11:08 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
Good point, Wendy. However I'd like to take into consideration that the weekend sessions are GNSo sessions (not council only) including newcomers. We can't really expect all having dived into the reports in advance. Personally I appreciate a brief refreshment of my memory shortly before the discussion starts.
Thanks Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Wendy Seltzer Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:46 AM To: Jonathan Robinson Cc: GNSO Council List Subject: Re: [council] Potential Topics / Action Items for Wrap-up
I'd like to suggest an update to our working methods: Let's get reports or slide-decks in writing in advance and begin at least the weekend sessions by taking the reports as read, starting directly with questions. It felt as though we spent a long time hearing summaries of reports rather than discussing issues with or consensus around them. I know I for one process information more thoroughly and more quickly in writing.
To aid that, can we ask for a set of links in one place (or even better, a single page HTML or PDF) containing everything we're expected to read, for advance printing/downloading.
Thanks, --Wendy
On 04/10/2013 09:49 PM, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
Wrap-up Session - Potential Topics to Cover
* GNSO Council Board - Next steps? * GNSO GAC / BGRI WG - Next Steps? * ICANN Durban Meeting Organisation * Response to / letter on EWG? * Policy and Implementation - Outcomes and next steps - Letter from GNSO Council to other SO/ACs? * GNSO Review - Consider self-review - Look at previous GNSO self-review work - Understand link / overlap with ATRT2 - Seek update from Ray Plzak * Motions due 8 business days before meeting - Change operating procedures or fix existing ones * Information channels for review of RAA / new gTLD agreement * Privacy/proxy DT * CWG - Where to next? * Review of Motions for next session * Template to request Issue Report * Plural vs. Singular new gTLDs - Any GNSO Council Action / Steps to be taken? * Lack of interest on IDN issues - how to promote next steps / action (Could staff ensure Council is continually appraised of developements?)
Action Items:
* GNSO Council Chair comment to public forum * GNSO Council Chair to write to: - Board / CEO re Council Policy Advice - Other SO & AC leaders regarding Policy & Implementation - Bruce Tonkin re previous GNSO review - BGRI WG and/or GAC re tabulated summary of policy interaction points Refer timing of motions to SCI (business vs calendar days, as well as time) * GNSO Council Chair to contact Chairs of SO/ACs to ask for interest in policy vs. implementation WG
participants (7)
-
David Cake -
john＠crediblecontext.com -
Jonathan Robinson -
Mason Cole -
Novoa, Osvaldo -
Wendy Seltzer -
WUKnoben