INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69
Dear all, Keith circulated<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-September/024088.html> earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69. Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed: Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC * DNS Abuse * Next steps for EPDP * Private use TLD * SubPro * Meta discussions on SSAC Advice Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020. * EPDP Phase 2 * Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations * Handling of priority 2 recommendations * EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps * EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update * Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC * IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2) * FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination * ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly. Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie
Thank you Nathalie. Just one comment. The ADR currently includes, for possible action on DNS abuse, “Council leadership to discuss topic with ccNSO.” Perhaps it could be included in the discussion topics for the Council meeting with the ccNSO. Cheers Tom From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org> Date: Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 7:21 am To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Dear all, Keith circulated<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-September/024088.html> earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69. Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed: Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC 1. DNS Abuse 2. Next steps for EPDP 3. Private use TLD 4. SubPro 5. Meta discussions on SSAC Advice Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020. 1. EPDP Phase 2 * Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations * Handling of priority 2 recommendations 1. EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps 2. EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update 3. Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC 1. IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2) 2. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 3. ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly. Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie
Tom et al Maybe it’d be more fruitful to be more specific about this? Do we have any specific questions for them? What value are we hoping to get out of the exchange? Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com> Date: Monday 5 October 2020 at 04:09 To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Thank you Nathalie. Just one comment. The ADR currently includes, for possible action on DNS abuse, “Council leadership to discuss topic with ccNSO.” Perhaps it could be included in the discussion topics for the Council meeting with the ccNSO. Cheers Tom From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org> Date: Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 7:21 am To: "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Dear all, Keith circulated<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-September/024088.html> earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69. Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed: Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC 1. DNS Abuse 2. Next steps for EPDP 3. Private use TLD 4. SubPro 5. Meta discussions on SSAC Advice Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020. 1. EPDP Phase 2 * Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations * Handling of priority 2 recommendations 1. EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps 2. EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update 3. Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC 1. IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2) 2. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 3. ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly. Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie
I agree with Tom – great suggestion - and of this is part of that debate, Michele: what do we all actually want/need here? Best Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Michele Neylon - Blacknight Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 10:56 AM To: Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>; Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>; council@gnso.icann.org Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Tom et al Maybe it’d be more fruitful to be more specific about this? Do we have any specific questions for them? What value are we hoping to get out of the exchange? Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com<mailto:tomwdale@gmail.com>> Date: Monday 5 October 2020 at 04:09 To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>>, "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Thank you Nathalie. Just one comment. The ADR currently includes, for possible action on DNS abuse, “Council leadership to discuss topic with ccNSO.” Perhaps it could be included in the discussion topics for the Council meeting with the ccNSO. Cheers Tom From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 7:21 am To: "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Dear all, Keith circulated<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-September/024088.html> earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69. Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed: Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC 1. DNS Abuse 2. Next steps for EPDP 3. Private use TLD 4. SubPro 5. Meta discussions on SSAC Advice Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020. 1. EPDP Phase 2 * Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations * Handling of priority 2 recommendations 1. EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps 2. EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update 3. Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC 1. IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2) 2. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 3. ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly. Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie
Something specific It’s very easy to simply say “abuse is a problem” and it’s also not exactly helpful Policy needs to be based on facts and facts come from data So that’s where I’d be looking -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> Date: Tuesday 6 October 2020 at 11:26 To: Michele Neylon <michele@blacknight.com>, Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 I agree with Tom – great suggestion - and of this is part of that debate, Michele: what do we all actually want/need here? Best Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Michele Neylon - Blacknight Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 10:56 AM To: Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>; Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>; council@gnso.icann.org Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Tom et al Maybe it’d be more fruitful to be more specific about this? Do we have any specific questions for them? What value are we hoping to get out of the exchange? Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com<mailto:tomwdale@gmail.com>> Date: Monday 5 October 2020 at 04:09 To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>>, "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Thank you Nathalie. Just one comment. The ADR currently includes, for possible action on DNS abuse, “Council leadership to discuss topic with ccNSO.” Perhaps it could be included in the discussion topics for the Council meeting with the ccNSO. Cheers Tom From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 7:21 am To: "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Dear all, Keith circulated<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-September/024088.html> earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69. Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed: Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC 1. DNS Abuse 2. Next steps for EPDP 3. Private use TLD 4. SubPro 5. Meta discussions on SSAC Advice Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020. 1. EPDP Phase 2 * Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations * Handling of priority 2 recommendations 1. EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps 2. EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update 3. Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC 1. IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2) 2. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 3. ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly. Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie
Indeed. Some thoughts on fixing any discussion in something specific: * Is there a need for scoping work, including an agreed definition and data sets, so that work by ICANN Org, contracted parties, ccTLD managers and others can be more focused? The term DNS abuse seems to mean different things depending on where it is being used, both within ICANN and in other international forums. * Are there synergies between GNSO and ccNSO in any scoping work that might be done (allowing for the different procedures within the two SOs – but data is data and contracted parties and ccTLDs both seem to have made major efforts at tracking a range of issues during the pandemic)? * The Council/ccNSO meeting is nearly a week after the plenary session on DNS abuse (about which I can find no specifics at this time) – can we compare notes on whether it was useful and if there are real action points (and if not can we agree on some)? Cheers Tom From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> Date: Tuesday, 6 October 2020 at 9:28 pm To: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be>, Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Something specific It’s very easy to simply say “abuse is a problem” and it’s also not exactly helpful Policy needs to be based on facts and facts come from data So that’s where I’d be looking -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> Date: Tuesday 6 October 2020 at 11:26 To: Michele Neylon <michele@blacknight.com>, Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>, "council@gnso.icann.org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: RE: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 I agree with Tom – great suggestion - and of this is part of that debate, Michele: what do we all actually want/need here? Best Marie From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> On Behalf Of Michele Neylon - Blacknight Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 10:56 AM To: Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com>; Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>; council@gnso.icann.org Cc: gnso-secs@icann.org Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Tom et al Maybe it’d be more fruitful to be more specific about this? Do we have any specific questions for them? What value are we hoping to get out of the exchange? Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Tom Dale <tomwdale@gmail.com<mailto:tomwdale@gmail.com>> Date: Monday 5 October 2020 at 04:09 To: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>>, "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Thank you Nathalie. Just one comment. The ADR currently includes, for possible action on DNS abuse, “Council leadership to discuss topic with ccNSO.” Perhaps it could be included in the discussion topics for the Council meeting with the ccNSO. Cheers Tom From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 7:21 am To: "council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>> Subject: [council] INPUT NEEDED: Discussion topics for bilateral GNSO Council sessions ICANN69 Dear all, Keith circulated<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-September/024088.html> earlier today the list of topics to be discussed during the joint GNSO GAC meeting taking place on Thursday 1 October 2020 at 12:00 UTC. A reminder that this session is open to observers, as are all GNSO Council sessions for ICANN69. Please find below a list of suggested discussion topics for the remaining joint sessions for which your input is needed: Meeting with the SSAC on Tuesday 13 October 2020 07:00 – 08:00 UTC 1. DNS Abuse 2. Next steps for EPDP 3. Private use TLD 4. SubPro 5. Meta discussions on SSAC Advice Meeting with ICANN Board on Tuesday 13 October 2020 10:00 – 11:30 UTC. Deadline for topics is Monday 5th October 2020. 1. EPDP Phase 2 * Cost benefit analysis for all SSAD-related recommendations * Handling of priority 2 recommendations 1. EPDP Phase 1 IRT - Recommendation 7: next steps 2. EPDP Phase 1 - Recommendation 12 Supplemental Recommendation: status update 3. Board’s suggested topic: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. In your preparation you may want to consider the results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). Meeting with the ccNSO on Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:30 – 12:00 UTC 1. IDNs (ccNSO PDP4, GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2) 2. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 3. ccNSO Board recall guideline, and related, potential future collaboration to change the ICANN Bylaws. Particularly, the need to make Annex D (incl timelines), more SO/AC friendly. Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie
participants (4)
-
Marie Pattullo -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight -
Nathalie Peregrine -
Tom Dale