Total agree ALAn. Would be quite over our mandate… Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 12:38 To: Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> Cc: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>, 'ALAC List' <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [ALAC] [GTLD-WG] [CPWG] Draft comment on the Fundamental Bylaw change. Evan, inclusion of the non-ccNSO ccTLDs was an integral (and by some deemed critical) part of the IANA Stewardship transition process, and since IANA serves non-ccNSO ccTLDs, it was felt important that they too can participate in any review. I do not believe that it is within our (ICANN's) mandate to re-litigate this and change the overall intent. Or at least, that is my understanding. For the record, currently 17 2ccTLDs out of 249 defined ccTLD are members and the list has been growing at about 5 per year over the last 5 years. Alan At 25/07/2019 01:35 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote: I understand the problem to be solved but don't like the wording of the replacement. Why should non-ccNSO-member ccTLD managers even be eligible? There is precious little incentive for ccTLD registries to have anything to do with ICANN. Eligibility for selection here ought to be part of such incentive. They should just change "Two" to "Three" in 18.7(a) and drop 18.7(b) entirely. No other rewording is needed. - Evan On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 18:18, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> > wrote: I was asked to draft the comment for the ALAC's response to the Public Comment on the Fundamental Bylaw Change ( https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=111384218 ). The Public Comment closes this Friday at 23:59 UTC. (about 50 hours from now) =================================== The ALAC supported the current version of the ICANN Bylaws Section 18.7(a) and 18.7(b), but understands that it has now proven to be difficult to implement. The ALAC agrees that the proposed change preserves the intent of the original Fundamental Bylaw and supports the change. Subject to any new information being brought to the ALAC's attention, the current intention is that the ALAC will support this Fundamental Bylaw change when it is present to the Empowered Community. _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org<mailto:CPWG@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ GTLD-WG mailing list GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -- Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada @evanleibovitch or @el56