Compliance showed us the number of complaints regarding unauthorized transfers yesterday. The numbers were low ranging from 1-20 a month, with little to no indication of real domain name hijacks. Account control panel compromises (a strong indicator) were absent for most of the months. Average domain transfers are around 400.000-500.000 a month. Best. Theo On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight via CPWG wrote:
I’d recommend you read the SSAC papers on hijacks as well as some of the background materials for previous IRTP PDPs
A lot of the locks that exist at the moment are due to past experience ie. Domains being hijacked etc.,
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
*From: *CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> *Date: *Tuesday, 9 November 2021 at 17:45 *To: *CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> *Subject: *[CPWG] Transfer Policy Review Team: Question about the 60-days lock *[EXTERNAL EMAIL]* Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.
Dear all,
At the TPR WG Meeting on Nov 9, 2021, the 60-days locks were discussed. The present policy – and the majority of Registry Operators, have a 60-days transfer lock after the initial registration of a domain name AND a 60-days lock after a successful inter-registrar transfer.
Based on the discussion in the TPR WG, I would like to hear the CPWG opinion by asking the following:
1. Are we in favor of keeping the 60-days lock after the initial registration of a domain name? 2. Are we in favor of keeping the 60-days lock after a successful transfer of a domain name? 3. Could the above be optional? 4. Should the Registrant has the option to opt-out?
I did not have the time to discuss this with the At-Large TPR members and observers, hence will not ask for a poll. But hopefully CPWG can express their view at the CPWG call on Nov 10, 2021.
Regards, Steinar Grøtterød _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.