Apologies, all, for putting this into the meeting reminder thread. But perhaps it will save some time in the meeting. I would be a lot more comfortable with the last question if, instead of - A Registry Operator MAY define a different transfer lock policy it offered - A Registry Operator MAY define a LONGER transfer lock, but not a SHORTER one, or - A Registry Operator MAY define a SHORTER transfer lock, but not a LONGER one Otherwise, we don't have a standard or a policy. At most, we have a Best Practices recommendation. And it would be clearer to say that explicitly. Bill Jouris On Wednesday, March 16, 2022, 08:27:13 AM PDT, Heidi Ullrich via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote: <!--#yiv9918170958 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv9918170958 #yiv9918170958 p.yiv9918170958MsoNormal, #yiv9918170958 li.yiv9918170958MsoNormal, #yiv9918170958 div.yiv9918170958MsoNormal {margin:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv9918170958 a:link, #yiv9918170958 span.yiv9918170958MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9918170958 span.yiv9918170958EmailStyle18 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv9918170958 .yiv9918170958MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv9918170958 div.yiv9918170958WordSection1 {}#yiv9918170958 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv9918170958 ol {margin-bottom:0cm;}#yiv9918170958 ul {margin-bottom:0cm;}--> Dear All, Please see below important information for today’s CPWG discussion onPost-creation and Post-Transfer Locks within the context of the Transfer Policy Review PDP. A series of polls will be shown during the discussion. The questions and relevant document are available in Steinar’s note. Kind regards, Heidi From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Reply to: Steinar Grøtterød <steinar@recito.no> Date: Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 4:31 AM To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks Dear all CPWG members, With the object to give background and a constructive discussion at the CPWG meeting, At-Large members in the GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP have created a document focus on the PDP charter questions connected to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks. The Google document located at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgw... [docs.google.com] should give the CPWG members the needed information to participate in an informal “poll”: QUESTION TO BE DISCUSSED BY CPWG MEMBERS For the post-creation lock question What lock period will be of preference: - 10 days post-creation lock - 30 days post-creation lock - 60 days post-creation lock - Not sure - Abstain For the post-transfer lock question What lock period will be of preference: - 10 days post-transfer lock - 30 days post-transfer lock - 60 days post-transfer lock - Not sure - Abstain For the question regarding Registry Operator - Same policy for all Registry Operator - A Registry Operator MAY define a different transfer lock policy - Not sure - Abstain I kindly ask the CPWG members to review theGoogle document [docs.google.com]. The CPWG chair may decide when to put this on the CPWG agenda. Regards, Steinar Grøtterød _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.