Dear Christopher, Here is the link: https://participate.icann.org/cpwg/ Kind regards, Claudia Ruiz -----Original Message----- From: registration-issues-wg <registration-issues-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> On Behalf Of wilkinson christopher Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 12:01 PM To: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>; cpwg@icann.org Subject: Re: [registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] Fwd: Message to RALO liaisons to WT5 Hello. Does anyone have the Adobe connect link for the CPWG call Now? CW
El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 18:12 Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> escribió:
Forwarded for Yrjö as this was rejected by CPWG list.
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Message to RALO liaisons to WT5 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:57:51 +0000 From: Yrjö Länsipuro <yrjo_lansipuro@hotmail.com> To: ali@hussein.me.ke <ali@hussein.me.ke>, maureen.hilyard@gmail.com <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com>, carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com>, mmoll@ca.inter.net <mmoll@ca.inter.net> CC: staff@atlarge.icann.org <staff@atlarge.icann.org>, cpwg@icann.org <cpwg@icann.org>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, ocl@gih.com <ocl@gih.com>
Dear fellow RALO WT5 liaisons,
An action item from the ALAC call 24 April asks me to take the initiative to develop a common ALAC position on geographic names in the subsequent gTLD procedures. During that call, Alan suggested that this effort could involve the five RALO liaisons to the WT5 and other interested people, and mentioned also CPWG.
I have not acted so far on this AI, because in my view, our only meaningful contribution to the WT5 process would be to suggest compromises to its most difficult issues, including names of non-capital cities, which WT5 has spent most of its time on, mostly engaged in a fruitless dispute between the extremes. The atmosphere so far might not have been conducive for discussing compromise proposals...
However, at ICANN62, there finally was a push by co-chairs for “meeting in the middle”, especially concerning non-capital cities, and for "seeking convergence on principles." See slides of the 28 June session: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__static.ptbl.co_st atic_attachments_179943_1530207670.pdf-3F1530207670&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3P Jp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=ds9md1zoepmwqw2nfk-Vs9ssxn1I3jP s97ekKkctEkM&m=NUC3iugbQd7or5XbkQfS1fbWXSzrLT09Ahes8aAy94U&s=MZ_y-GrJ7 ajm_77qDMcFI-M30ZZPR7aVj1ltO9XVr3U&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__static.ptbl.co_s tatic_attachments_179943_1530207670.pdf-3F1530207670&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3 PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=ds9md1zoepmwqw2nfk-Vs9ssxn1I3j Ps97ekKkctEkM&m=NUC3iugbQd7or5XbkQfS1fbWXSzrLT09Ahes8aAy94U&s=MZ_y-GrJ 7ajm_77qDMcFI-M30ZZPR7aVj1ltO9XVr3U&e=>
Now might be the time for an ALAC contribution along the lines that Alan has often repeated: there should be no big winners and big losers in the WT 5. In others words, a compromise, something in the middle.
That’s why I’m asking for your thoughts, ideas and suggestions on how we could facilitate finding compromises in the WT5, especially on the issue of non-capital cities. This is late in the day in the life of WT5, so please react soon.After an email exchange, we could ask the staff to arrange a call, if necessary. I’m also asking CPWG to take note of this effort, the results of which I hope could be presented to CPWG soon.
Yrjö
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ registration-issues-wg mailing list registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ registration-issues-wg mailing list registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg