I think the only groups that are happy with the EPDP process are the Contracted Parties and the NCSG. SSAC, ALAC, GAC and CSG (or at least BC & IPC) are all various shades of unhappy. I assume ccNSO and ASO just don't care...? -------------------------------------------------------------------- *Greg Shatan | President, ISOC-NY* greg@isoc-ny.org *"The Internet is for everyone"* On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:37 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Correct. I sent a link to the CPWG on 14 May. The document can be found at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-111-en.pdf.
Alan
At 2020-06-29 07:25 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
The other interesting document is SAC 111. They are VERY unhappy with the EPDP process and strong on both the accuracy and legal vs natural issues.
Holly
On Jun 30, 2020, at 3:20 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
<ICANN68+GAC+Communique.pdf>
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.