On 05/12/2019 18:56, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
How would an "expert" have approached this topic of trust in .ORG? By showing the good that .ORG and PIR has done. PR 101.
I'm not trying to be a jerk here but living in DC for 30 years, I've seen LOTS of .ORG sites that were fronts for corporations or other disingenuous actors. I know Evan is upset about the fact that it's being written now, in the context of this controversy, but from the perspective of trust, are folks (are WE?!) right to be trusting of .ORG domains in their current form? The intent, from what I have read, with this piece is to do down .ORG and diminish its credibility by presenting negative examples. It isn't a question of "trust" but rather the manipulation of the public perception of .ORG as being just another gTLD. Regards...jmcc -- ********************************************************** John McCormac * e-mail: jmcc@hosterstats.com MC2 * web: http://www.hosterstats.com/ 22 Viewmount * Domain Registrations Statistics Waterford * Domnomics - the business of domain names Ireland * https://amzn.to/2OPtEIO IE * Skype: hosterstats.com **********************************************************