Thank you to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC. Please read the email below for details. Kind regards, Justine On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:

What is this about?

During the CPWG Call on 8 Oct 2025 <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AYCkHg>, we introduced the GNSO Board Readiness - Final Report of 11 Sep 2025 <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2025/correspondence/br-sma...> (“Report”) and began discussing the six recommendations contained therein (see: Presentation slide deck <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/514097153/20...> )

As we did not have a lot of time to discuss these recommendations at that CPWG call, we are now seeking At-Large input on the recommendations, for further consideration during the At-Large Consolidation Policy Working Group (CPWG) session at ICANN84 on 26 October 2025 at 15:00 UTC <https://icann84.sched.com/event/29QJW>.

The Report is the product of the GNSO Council’s Small Team on Board Readiness, which captures ongoing discussions regarding “Board readiness,” its shorthand for operation of a [GNSO] Policy Development Process (PDP) that improves the chances of timely ICANN Board adoption of PDP recommendations.

Why is this important?

The GNSO’s approach to Board readiness is very likely to lead to changes to how GNSO PDPs are conducted, which in turn, impacts how the At-Large community may participate in policy development in areas under the GNSO’s remit (such as gTLDs, DNS Abuse mitigation, registration data accuracy, just to name a few) and how effective such participation could be.

What input are we seeking?

We recommend that you review the Report <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2025/correspondence/br-sma...> and/or the Presentation slide deck <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/514097153/20...> to provide input on the six recommendations that will be considered at length by the GNSO Council at ICANN84. Please provide your input by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC.

Thank you!

Kind regards, Alan Greenberg, Avri Doria, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, and Justine Chew

On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 at 23:46, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Dear all,

On the agenda of the CPWG Call on 8 Oct 2025 at 22:00 UTC <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AYCkHg> is an item regarding the GNSO Board Readiness project.

Since we don't have a lot of time set aside for it, I am circulating the links to the following, in the hope that you will have read them and will be prepared to discuss the 6 recommendations being proposed to GNSO Council:

1. GNSO Board Readiness - Final Report, 11 Sep 2025 <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2025/correspondence/br-sma...> 2. Presentation slide deck <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/download/attachments/514097153/20...>

Kind regards,

*Justine Chew* At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------

Good evening: Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format. Regards Christopher ____________________ 1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true. The GNSO by itself is not multi-stakeholder by any stretch of the imagination. The report itself tacitly recognises this and touches on how the gross imbalance in numbers and resources skews the outcome of the PDPs. Hopefully, moving from the ‘Open Model’ towards a ‘Representative Model’ will facilitate this much needed correction. 2. The report refers to the Board’s Global Public Interest check list <https://icannwiki.org/Global_Public_Interest>. (p.11) I suppose that it is excellent for the Board to have such a list. But it is surprising that, apparently, it has not already been shared with the PDPs, bearing in mind that a large part of the rationale for multi-stakeholder governance is indeed that, collectively, it can identify, respect and implement the public Interest. 3. The report is unfortunately silent on the question as to by who and how is it decided which subjects merit or require a PDP, or not as the case may be. Two examples illustrate the point: - ICANN had known for years, and had been repeatedly officially reminded, that the privacy and data protection policies enshrined in Whois practices were not compatible with European laws. But nothing was done, until the Whois EPDP was launched ‘en catastrophe’ ostensibly in response to the simple fact that GDPR introduced fines for non-compliance! There was no mechanism to initiate a PDP years ago which could have anticipated and avoided the problems arising from GDPR. - Geographical indications <https://www.wipo.int/en/web/geographical-indications> are an IPR and are protected in law in many countries and sectors. In spite of the ‘Applicable local law’ clause in the Articles of Incorporation, the view in ICANN still seems to be that protection of GIs (e.g. in UDRP) would require a PDP. I am reasonably confident that the issue will arise when there is a call for proposals for new gTLDS. Meanwhile, is there a mechanism to initiate a PDP to implement the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation? ____________________________ 

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in this Googledoc <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine

...

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com <mailto:justine.chew.icann@gmail.com>> wrote:

...

What is this about?

1+ to Christopher w

lists--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> hat am 30.10.2025 13:52 CET geschrieben:

Allow me to react to what we have just heard in the ICANN Public Forum (ICANN84 Dublin.)

A participant speaking on behalf of the working group on Latin Diacritics stated that the Applicant Guide Book for the next gTLD Round would not include Latin Diacritics. The response from the Board was that, absent a recommendation from GNSO, “our hands are tied”!

I recall that the IDN issue has been on ICANN’s table, to my certain knowledge since ICANN03 1999 Santiago. (I was there). It should have been settled by now. Furthermore, casual inspection of the World’s literature, media and press would confirm that latin diacritics are integral to languages widely used in the Americas, Africa, Europe and elsewhere. One does not have to be a universal linguist to appreciate the social, economic and cultural scale of this issue. Their use in the DNS should have been a no-brainer a long time ago.

Since ICANN84 has not yet concluded, may I request that this situation be reviewed during the ALAC wrap up this afternoon and addressed again to the IANN Board during the concluding session.

Thank you for your attention

Christopher Wilkinson (on-line)

...

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:11, cw--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Good evening:

Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format.

Regards

Christopher

____________________

...

1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true.

____________________________

...

...

...

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote: Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in this Googledoc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs... by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine

...

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com mailto:justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:

...

What is this about?

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Hi Christopher,  Just to be clear, I tried (and apparently failed) to make clear that, while I am a member of the Latin Diacritics Working Group, I was speaking strictly in a personal capacity, and not on behalf the WG.  That said, I appreciate the support.  And that of Sergo Salinas of LACRALO, who also spoke on the subject.  Bill Jouris  Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 5:59 AM, Alan Greenberg via CPWG<cpwg@icann.org> wrote: _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

If the Board was to make a significant mistake leading to a train wreck, would you let them? You are all physically in Dublin. 90 minutes away from the AGM's public Board meeting. You have the ability to put together ALAC Chair + Vice Chairs + Consultants (like you) + ALAC selected Board Member (Leon) to request an emergency bilateral meeting with the Board Chair + Vice Chair - perhaps even pulling in the Canadian GAC Rep and GAC Chair too. Everyone's at most physically 10-15 minutes away from you. Don't tell me it's too late because we've had such emergency meetings in the past. That's what face to face meetings are for. Otherwise we could dispense of face to face meetings altogether and run ICANN remotely throughout the year like a public administration and *a train with no leadership*. Kindest regards, Olivier On 30/10/2025 12:58, Alan Greenberg via CPWG wrote:

I support the sentiment, but note that the concluding session is a Board meeting with no opportunity for Board input.

Alan

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 12:53 PM lists--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Allow me to react to what we have just heard in the ICANN Public Forum (ICANN84 Dublin.)

A participant speaking on behalf of the working group on Latin Diacritics stated that the Applicant Guide Book for the next gTLD Round would not include Latin Diacritics. The response from the Board was that, absent a recommendation from GNSO, “our hands are tied”!

I recall that the IDN issue has been on ICANN’s table, to my certain knowledge since ICANN03 1999 Santiago. (I was there). It should have been settled by now.

Furthermore, casual inspection of the World’s literature, media and press would confirm that latin diacritics are integral to languages widely used in the Americas, Africa, Europe and elsewhere. One does not have to be a universal linguist to appreciate the social, economic and cultural scale of this issue. Their use in the DNS should have been a no-brainer a long time ago.

*Since ICANN84 has not yet concluded, may I request that this situation be reviewed during the ALAC wrap up this afternoon and addressed again to the IANN Board during the concluding session.*

* *

Thank you for your attention

Christopher Wilkinson (on-line)

...

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:11, cw--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Good evening:

Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format.

Regards

Christopher

____________________

...

1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true.

____________________________

...

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine * *

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:

What is this about?

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list --cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email tocpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Dear Colleagues, you will have seen the email exchange on 30 October 2025 - as quoted below. You will have also heard the robust discussion that took place during the At-Large Leadership Wrap-Up which you can watch on: https://icann84.sched.com/event/29QNg/at-large-leadership-wrap-up During the wrap-up, the ALAC Chair, Jonathan Zuck, mentioned a short follow-up meeting to take place immediately after the wrap-up and immediately before the ICANN Board AGM Meeting. Shortly after this meeting, as a follow-up action, Jonathan Zuck and Justine Chew, ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council, had a brief meeting with the At-Large Selected Board member Leon Sanchez as well as Board member Alan Barrett, the Shepherd of IDN related work on the ICANN Board. At the ICANN Board AGM of 30 October 2025 - Vote of Resolution (2025.10.30.12), the ICANN Board adopted this version of the New gTLD Program: 2026 Round Applicant Guidebook <https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-gtld-prog...> Alan Barrett intervened before the vote, mentioning the Latin Diacritics at 44:53: "I'd also like to say a few words about Latin Diacritics, if I may. There is an ongoing PDP on dealing with Latin Diacritics. We have not received output from that. It's possible that something may come later and it's my personal hope that we'll be able to incorporate it although it's going to depend a lot on timing. Thanks." As a result, the At-Large Community now need to work with the LD PDP working group to get their policy recommendations in front of GNSO Council as quickly as possible, for consideration and approval, then sending it to the ICANN Board for inclusion in the current version of the Applicant Guidebook. The ICANN Board resolution leaves the door open for minor changes: "The President and CEO, or his designee(s), is authorized to make changes to the Guidebook adopted on this day as necessary, so long as such changes do not alter or affect the Guidebook's principles and core policies that were considered and approved by the Board concerning the next round." So let's all hope the Latin Diacritics (LD) working group results will be able to complete its work on time. In the meantime, I would like to thank Sergio Salinas Porto and Christopher Wilkinson for expressing the importance of this issue for their community. I would like to thank Satish Babu and Bill Jouris for not only raising the importance of this issue at this ICANN meeting, but for their relentless work on the Latin Diacritics PDP. It is firmly thanks to their hard work and that of their colleagues on the LD PDP, that they are progressing faster than expected. I would also like to thank Justine Chew and Jonathan Zuck, for their fast action, at very short notice, meeting up with Leon Sanchez and Alan Barrett and directly expressing the concerns of our Community with only minutes to spare until the ICANN Board AGM. It is thanks to this fast action that it is clear and on the record that the door is open for the LD PDP results to be taken into account in this round's Applicant Guidebook. Policy Advice as undertaken by the ALAC at ICANN is not just the drafting of formal ALAC Advice. It also involves the use of on the floor diplomacy to make sure the end user perspective is shared and promoted where and when it matters most. If I am writing this email, it is because we unfortunately often focus on our failings. Well, today we can focus on a success - perhaps a small success - but nonetheless a success of being able to influence matters that are important to our community. I hope that this serves as a lesson to everyone that you cannot win a battle if you start by saying it's too late. It's never too late to do the right thing. Well done everyone. Olivier On 30/10/2025 14:50, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG wrote:

Dear Christopher,

thank you for picking this up. Watching the ICANN84 public forum, I noted the intervention of both:

- Sergio Salina Porto - Bill Jouris

Quoting from the instantaneous transcript:

----- start of quote ---------------

/SPEAKER:  Okay. Thank you. [Laughs] I am going to speak Spanish, please use headphones. I would like to express my concern for the lack of a point in ICANN guidebook for Latin diacritics PDP. This PDP addresses the possibility of end-users to see their languages properly represented in the Domain Name System including the use of diacritics in the Latin. This is not just a technical issue, it affects the way in which communities write the name and identify themselves online. I am not requesting any extension for the Next Round nor changes in the timeline that was already published. The request that I'm making here is particularly that the applicant guidebook includes a clear because that if the Latin diacritics PDP presents recommendations within the time that is already set, the recommendations will be included in the round. I consider this a reasonable adaptation of the community work that has a impact on the cultural and linguistic sphere and aspects and nature of users. I did not introduce myself, my name is -- and I'm the outgoing secretary of --. I am making the statement in my personal capacity and not on behalf of my region, thank you. / / MAARTEN BOTTERMAN: Thank you, Sergio. Who can answer this? / / ALAN BARRETT:  Thank you, Sergio, for your suggestion. I share your belief that Latin diacritics are very important and there are many well deserving cases where they would be necessary and also where the key without diacritics should maybe live together with the version with the diacritics. In a similar way to help IDN variance are handled. Unfortunately with the timing of this work I think it is probably too late for it to be included but ICANN Org staff will try to see if something is possible. We can't commit to anything but we can try. /

--- end of quote -------

and later:

---- start of quote ------------

/CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN:  Thank you, Tripti. We go back to the left microphone. / / SPEAKER:  My name is Bill. Why I am a member of the Latin diacritics PDP Working Group, speaking in a individual capacity. This is a continuation of the remarks Sergio made earlier. When the Latin diacritics Working Group was established a year ago, the GNSO gave us a extremely aggressive timeline getting the work done, which we are happily ahead of. But they would not have done that it seems to me if they were fine with the idea that well, we will get around to actually implementing this at some hypothetical future round sometime years down the road. I think they did that because they thought something needed to be done now. In the beginning of the year the Working Group put in a request that the applicant guidebook include a placeholder for our work to be added in and we were assured that it will happen. In the event, it didn't. So sometime soon, maybe even this afternoon, the Board will be asked to sign off on the applicant guidebook. It may be that it will do that, it's maybe that you will decline and send it back for them to get it right. I will just be clear if you say yes, we are proving it, you are sending a message. There are doubtless reasons beyond those that were offered earlier, ICANN internal reasons why things ought to charge forward. Be very clear that outside the ICANN bubble nobody cares about ICANN internal reasons. All they will hear is a message, ICANN does not care about your language and does not care about you. Now you may be comfortable with that or you may feel like this is not the message we are sending, but be clear that is the message that will be received, ICANN does not care. / / CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN:  Thank you for your comment. Alan? / / ALAN BARRETT:  I will try to take this. Thank you very much for your comments. I very much agree that it is important but on the other hand we do have to follow our process. We have not received policy or guidance from the GNSO Council on what to do and maybe the GNSO Council would like to make a request to the Board to put in some kind of placeholder. Personally I would very much welcome that but it has not happened and for now I think our hands are tied. / / SPEAKER:  You have authority, your hands are not tied by anyone but yourselves. Thank you. / / CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN:  Thank you and with that. /

---------- end of quote --------------

To me, it reads like ICANN is once again on an autopilot to rubber stamp the Final AG whilst under commercial pressures to do so, and in the process, is ready to commit mistakes that it will regret later. Earlier in the week we had a session hosted by At-Large speaking about the wider implications of ICANN's decisions on a geopolitical level and collectively, Board members appear to be oblivious to such important geopolitical consequences, potentially because they are not being counselled adequately about these issues. This is potentially an ICANN failure caused by the general group think that we so often see in the ICANN commercial space.

The Board AGM meeting later this afternoon is indeed a public rubber stamping of resolutions that have already been agreed in advance by the Board in its pre-AGM meeting.

What could be done?

1. Ask our GNSO Liaison Justine Chew on what she suggest could be done NOW 2. Propose that the ALAC issue a very short Statement to be sent to the Board prior to the AGM that the Board should agree to an amendment to their resolution in recognising the Latin Diacritics issue and naming a placeholder in the final Applicant Guidebook for this.

There have been many instances in ICANN's history when, at the very last minute, some resolution text has been added at the last minute - a "friendly amendment" - to keep the door open to include the results of the Latin Diacritics at a placeholder in the final AG.

3. Failing this - because unfortunately the system sometimes sets us up for failure, the ALAC should work with the Canadian Government GAC + other GAC whose languages are affected by this lack of inclusion of the results of the Latin Diacritics Issue. This is a heavier process and one that does not shine a good light onto ICANN's ability to perform its task - rather the opposite, which is that now the GAC has a major issue with ICANN - just like it had in the final months leading to the last round.

I will address this issue in my CPWG report this afternoon. (taking my co-chair's hat off, though)

This is a time to act fast. Otherwise, why are we meeting face to face for?

Kindest regards,

Olivier (own views)

On 30/10/2025 12:52, lists@christopherwilkinson.eu wrote:

...

Allow me to react to what we have just heard in the ICANN Public Forum (ICANN84 Dublin.)

A participant speaking on behalf of the working group on Latin Diacritics stated that the Applicant Guide Book for the next gTLD Round would not include Latin Diacritics. The response from the Board was that, absent a recommendation from GNSO, “our hands are tied”!

I recall that the IDN issue has been on ICANN’s table, to my certain knowledge since ICANN03 1999 Santiago. (I was there). It should have been settled by now.

Furthermore, casual inspection of the World’s literature, media and press would confirm that latin diacritics are integral to languages widely used in the Americas, Africa, Europe and elsewhere. One does not have to be a universal linguist to appreciate the social, economic and cultural scale of this issue. Their use in the DNS should have been a no-brainer a long time ago.

*Since ICANN84 has not yet concluded, may I request that this situation be reviewed during the ALAC wrap up this afternoon and addressed again to the IANN Board during the concluding session.*

* *

Thank you for your attention

Christopher Wilkinson (on-line)

...

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:11, cw--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Good evening:

Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format.

Regards

Christopher

____________________

...

1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true.

____________________________

...

...

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine * *

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:

What is this about?

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list --cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email tocpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Dear Olivier and everyone, I've always believed that "The last battle lost is the one that's abandoned" (in fact, anyone who comes near me and looks at my mate gourd will see this phrase written on it). I agree with you. The work done all this time by the group of diacritical characters of the Latin alphabet, the intervention of Bill Juris, Satish Babu, Christopher Wilkinson, your last-minute guidance shedding light on where to go, and my own small contribution, allowed ALAC to score this goal just seconds before the end of the match, with two great strikers: Justin Chew and Jonathan Zuck. It was all a collective effort, like a great team. In Argentina, we say that "No one is saved alone, we always get through it together." I left Ireland with a taste of victory. These kinds of collective actions are what give meaning to ALAC's existence. Good job, team! Now, keep a close eye on the PDP! *Sergio Salinas Porto**Presidente Internauta Argentina - LACRALO/ICANN <https://atlarge.icann.org/ralos/lacralo>**Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar/>/FeTIA <http://www.fetia.org.ar/>**FUILAC- Federación de Usuarios de Internet de LAC <https://fuilac.org>**facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> **twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas>**Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819**"Ojalá podamos ser desobedientes, cada vez que recibimos órdenes que humillan nuestra * * conciencia o violan nuestro sentido común" Eduardo Galeano* El sáb, 1 nov 2025 a las 17:19, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond (<ocl@gih.com>) escribió:

Dear Colleagues,

you will have seen the email exchange on 30 October 2025 - as quoted below.

You will have also heard the robust discussion that took place during the At-Large Leadership Wrap-Up which you can watch on: https://icann84.sched.com/event/29QNg/at-large-leadership-wrap-up

During the wrap-up, the ALAC Chair, Jonathan Zuck, mentioned a short follow-up meeting to take place immediately after the wrap-up and immediately before the ICANN Board AGM Meeting. Shortly after this meeting, as a follow-up action, Jonathan Zuck and Justine Chew, ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council, had a brief meeting with the At-Large Selected Board member Leon Sanchez as well as Board member Alan Barrett, the Shepherd of IDN related work on the ICANN Board.

At the ICANN Board AGM of 30 October 2025 - Vote of Resolution (2025.10.30.12), the ICANN Board adopted this version of the New gTLD Program: 2026 Round Applicant Guidebook <https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-gtld-prog...>

Alan Barrett intervened before the vote, mentioning the Latin Diacritics at 44:53:

"I'd also like to say a few words about Latin Diacritics, if I may. There is an ongoing PDP on dealing with Latin Diacritics. We have not received output from that. It's possible that something may come later and it's my personal hope that we'll be able to incorporate it although it's going to depend a lot on timing. Thanks."

As a result, the At-Large Community now need to work with the LD PDP working group to get their policy recommendations in front of GNSO Council as quickly as possible, for consideration and approval, then sending it to the ICANN Board for inclusion in the current version of the Applicant Guidebook.

The ICANN Board resolution leaves the door open for minor changes:

"The President and CEO, or his designee(s), is authorized to make changes to the Guidebook adopted on this day as necessary, so long as such changes do not alter or affect the Guidebook's principles and core policies that were considered and approved by the Board concerning the next round."

So let's all hope the Latin Diacritics (LD) working group results will be able to complete its work on time.

In the meantime, I would like to thank Sergio Salinas Porto and Christopher Wilkinson for expressing the importance of this issue for their community.

I would like to thank Satish Babu and Bill Jouris for not only raising the importance of this issue at this ICANN meeting, but for their relentless work on the Latin Diacritics PDP. It is firmly thanks to their hard work and that of their colleagues on the LD PDP, that they are progressing faster than expected.

I would also like to thank Justine Chew and Jonathan Zuck, for their fast action, at very short notice, meeting up with Leon Sanchez and Alan Barrett and directly expressing the concerns of our Community with only minutes to spare until the ICANN Board AGM.

It is thanks to this fast action that it is clear and on the record that the door is open for the LD PDP results to be taken into account in this round's Applicant Guidebook.

Policy Advice as undertaken by the ALAC at ICANN is not just the drafting of formal ALAC Advice. It also involves the use of on the floor diplomacy to make sure the end user perspective is shared and promoted where and when it matters most. If I am writing this email, it is because we unfortunately often focus on our failings. Well, today we can focus on a success - perhaps a small success - but nonetheless a success of being able to influence matters that are important to our community.

I hope that this serves as a lesson to everyone that you cannot win a battle if you start by saying it's too late.

It's never too late to do the right thing.

Well done everyone.

Olivier

On 30/10/2025 14:50, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG wrote:

Dear Christopher,

thank you for picking this up. Watching the ICANN84 public forum, I noted the intervention of both:

- Sergio Salina Porto - Bill Jouris

Quoting from the instantaneous transcript:

----- start of quote ---------------

*SPEAKER: Okay. Thank you. [Laughs] I am going to speak Spanish, please use headphones. I would like to express my concern for the lack of a point in ICANN guidebook for Latin diacritics PDP. This PDP addresses the possibility of end-users to see their languages properly represented in the Domain Name System including the use of diacritics in the Latin. This is not just a technical issue, it affects the way in which communities write the name and identify themselves online. I am not requesting any extension for the Next Round nor changes in the timeline that was already published. The request that I'm making here is particularly that the applicant guidebook includes a clear because that if the Latin diacritics PDP presents recommendations within the time that is already set, the recommendations will be included in the round. I consider this a reasonable adaptation of the community work that has a impact on the cultural and linguistic sphere and aspects and nature of users. I did not introduce myself, my name is -- and I'm the outgoing secretary of --. I am making the statement in my personal capacity and not on behalf of my region, thank you. *

* MAARTEN BOTTERMAN: Thank you, Sergio. Who can answer this? * * ALAN BARRETT: Thank you, Sergio, for your suggestion. I share your belief that Latin diacritics are very important and there are many well deserving cases where they would be necessary and also where the key without diacritics should maybe live together with the version with the diacritics. In a similar way to help IDN variance are handled. Unfortunately with the timing of this work I think it is probably too late for it to be included but ICANN Org staff will try to see if something is possible. We can't commit to anything but we can try. *

--- end of quote -------

and later:

---- start of quote ------------

*CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN: Thank you, Tripti. We go back to the left microphone. *

* SPEAKER: My name is Bill. Why I am a member of the Latin diacritics PDP Working Group, speaking in a individual capacity. This is a continuation of the remarks Sergio made earlier. When the Latin diacritics Working Group was established a year ago, the GNSO gave us a extremely aggressive timeline getting the work done, which we are happily ahead of. But they would not have done that it seems to me if they were fine with the idea that well, we will get around to actually implementing this at some hypothetical future round sometime years down the road. I think they did that because they thought something needed to be done now. In the beginning of the year the Working Group put in a request that the applicant guidebook include a placeholder for our work to be added in and we were assured that it will happen. In the event, it didn't. So sometime soon, maybe even this afternoon, the Board will be asked to sign off on the applicant guidebook. It may be that it will do that, it's maybe that you will decline and send it back for them to get it right. I will just be clear if you say yes, we are proving it, you are sending a message. There are doubtless reasons beyond those that were offered earlier, ICANN internal reasons why things ought to charge forward. Be very clear that outside the ICANN bubble nobody cares about ICANN internal reasons. All they will hear is a message, ICANN does not care about your language and does not care about you. Now you may be comfortable with that or you may feel like this is not the message we are sending, but be clear that is the message that will be received, ICANN does not care. *

* CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN: Thank you for your comment. Alan? *

* ALAN BARRETT: I will try to take this. Thank you very much for your comments. I very much agree that it is important but on the other hand we do have to follow our process. We have not received policy or guidance from the GNSO Council on what to do and maybe the GNSO Council would like to make a request to the Board to put in some kind of placeholder. Personally I would very much welcome that but it has not happened and for now I think our hands are tied. *

* SPEAKER: You have authority, your hands are not tied by anyone but yourselves. Thank you. * * CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN: Thank you and with that. *

---------- end of quote --------------

To me, it reads like ICANN is once again on an autopilot to rubber stamp the Final AG whilst under commercial pressures to do so, and in the process, is ready to commit mistakes that it will regret later. Earlier in the week we had a session hosted by At-Large speaking about the wider implications of ICANN's decisions on a geopolitical level and collectively, Board members appear to be oblivious to such important geopolitical consequences, potentially because they are not being counselled adequately about these issues. This is potentially an ICANN failure caused by the general group think that we so often see in the ICANN commercial space.

The Board AGM meeting later this afternoon is indeed a public rubber stamping of resolutions that have already been agreed in advance by the Board in its pre-AGM meeting.

What could be done?

1. Ask our GNSO Liaison Justine Chew on what she suggest could be done NOW 2. Propose that the ALAC issue a very short Statement to be sent to the Board prior to the AGM that the Board should agree to an amendment to their resolution in recognising the Latin Diacritics issue and naming a placeholder in the final Applicant Guidebook for this.

There have been many instances in ICANN's history when, at the very last minute, some resolution text has been added at the last minute - a "friendly amendment" - to keep the door open to include the results of the Latin Diacritics at a placeholder in the final AG.

3. Failing this - because unfortunately the system sometimes sets us up for failure, the ALAC should work with the Canadian Government GAC + other GAC whose languages are affected by this lack of inclusion of the results of the Latin Diacritics Issue. This is a heavier process and one that does not shine a good light onto ICANN's ability to perform its task - rather the opposite, which is that now the GAC has a major issue with ICANN - just like it had in the final months leading to the last round.

I will address this issue in my CPWG report this afternoon. (taking my co-chair's hat off, though)

This is a time to act fast. Otherwise, why are we meeting face to face for?

Kindest regards,

Olivier (own views)

On 30/10/2025 12:52, lists@christopherwilkinson.eu wrote:

Allow me to react to what we have just heard in the ICANN Public Forum (ICANN84 Dublin.)

A participant speaking on behalf of the working group on Latin Diacritics stated that the Applicant Guide Book for the next gTLD Round would not include Latin Diacritics. The response from the Board was that, absent a recommendation from GNSO, “our hands are tied”!

I recall that the IDN issue has been on ICANN’s table, to my certain knowledge since ICANN03 1999 Santiago. (I was there). It should have been settled by now.

Furthermore, casual inspection of the World’s literature, media and press would confirm that latin diacritics are integral to languages widely used in the Americas, Africa, Europe and elsewhere. One does not have to be a universal linguist to appreciate the social, economic and cultural scale of this issue. Their use in the DNS should have been a no-brainer a long time ago.

*Since ICANN84 has not yet concluded, may I request that this situation be reviewed during the ALAC wrap up this afternoon and addressed again to the IANN Board during the concluding session.*

Thank you for your attention

Christopher Wilkinson (on-line)

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:11, cw--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Good evening:

Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format.

Regards

Christopher

____________________

1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true.

____________________________

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com>

...

wrote:

...

What is this about?

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Echoing OCL's sentiments! Big +1 to everyone who participated and took action. OCL forgot to mention this but I can tell you that when he was Chair of the ALAC, we used a lot of what he called floor diplomacy to our advantage. We would have numerous 'off-schedule' discussions with certain influential GNSO Councillors who shall remain nameless but definitely shared the belief system that forked that approach. Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 at 15:19, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG < cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

you will have seen the email exchange on 30 October 2025 - as quoted below.

You will have also heard the robust discussion that took place during the At-Large Leadership Wrap-Up which you can watch on: https://icann84.sched.com/event/29QNg/at-large-leadership-wrap-up

During the wrap-up, the ALAC Chair, Jonathan Zuck, mentioned a short follow-up meeting to take place immediately after the wrap-up and immediately before the ICANN Board AGM Meeting. Shortly after this meeting, as a follow-up action, Jonathan Zuck and Justine Chew, ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council, had a brief meeting with the At-Large Selected Board member Leon Sanchez as well as Board member Alan Barrett, the Shepherd of IDN related work on the ICANN Board.

At the ICANN Board AGM of 30 October 2025 - Vote of Resolution (2025.10.30.12), the ICANN Board adopted this version of the New gTLD Program: 2026 Round Applicant Guidebook <https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-gtld-prog...>

Alan Barrett intervened before the vote, mentioning the Latin Diacritics at 44:53:

"I'd also like to say a few words about Latin Diacritics, if I may. There is an ongoing PDP on dealing with Latin Diacritics. We have not received output from that. It's possible that something may come later and it's my personal hope that we'll be able to incorporate it although it's going to depend a lot on timing. Thanks."

As a result, the At-Large Community now need to work with the LD PDP working group to get their policy recommendations in front of GNSO Council as quickly as possible, for consideration and approval, then sending it to the ICANN Board for inclusion in the current version of the Applicant Guidebook.

The ICANN Board resolution leaves the door open for minor changes:

"The President and CEO, or his designee(s), is authorized to make changes to the Guidebook adopted on this day as necessary, so long as such changes do not alter or affect the Guidebook's principles and core policies that were considered and approved by the Board concerning the next round."

So let's all hope the Latin Diacritics (LD) working group results will be able to complete its work on time.

In the meantime, I would like to thank Sergio Salinas Porto and Christopher Wilkinson for expressing the importance of this issue for their community.

I would like to thank Satish Babu and Bill Jouris for not only raising the importance of this issue at this ICANN meeting, but for their relentless work on the Latin Diacritics PDP. It is firmly thanks to their hard work and that of their colleagues on the LD PDP, that they are progressing faster than expected.

I would also like to thank Justine Chew and Jonathan Zuck, for their fast action, at very short notice, meeting up with Leon Sanchez and Alan Barrett and directly expressing the concerns of our Community with only minutes to spare until the ICANN Board AGM.

It is thanks to this fast action that it is clear and on the record that the door is open for the LD PDP results to be taken into account in this round's Applicant Guidebook.

Policy Advice as undertaken by the ALAC at ICANN is not just the drafting of formal ALAC Advice. It also involves the use of on the floor diplomacy to make sure the end user perspective is shared and promoted where and when it matters most. If I am writing this email, it is because we unfortunately often focus on our failings. Well, today we can focus on a success - perhaps a small success - but nonetheless a success of being able to influence matters that are important to our community.

I hope that this serves as a lesson to everyone that you cannot win a battle if you start by saying it's too late.

It's never too late to do the right thing.

Well done everyone.

Olivier

On 30/10/2025 14:50, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG wrote:

Dear Christopher,

thank you for picking this up. Watching the ICANN84 public forum, I noted the intervention of both:

- Sergio Salina Porto - Bill Jouris

Quoting from the instantaneous transcript:

----- start of quote ---------------

*SPEAKER: Okay. Thank you. [Laughs] I am going to speak Spanish, please use headphones. I would like to express my concern for the lack of a point in ICANN guidebook for Latin diacritics PDP. This PDP addresses the possibility of end-users to see their languages properly represented in the Domain Name System including the use of diacritics in the Latin. This is not just a technical issue, it affects the way in which communities write the name and identify themselves online. I am not requesting any extension for the Next Round nor changes in the timeline that was already published. The request that I'm making here is particularly that the applicant guidebook includes a clear because that if the Latin diacritics PDP presents recommendations within the time that is already set, the recommendations will be included in the round. I consider this a reasonable adaptation of the community work that has a impact on the cultural and linguistic sphere and aspects and nature of users. I did not introduce myself, my name is -- and I'm the outgoing secretary of --. I am making the statement in my personal capacity and not on behalf of my region, thank you. *

* MAARTEN BOTTERMAN: Thank you, Sergio. Who can answer this? * * ALAN BARRETT: Thank you, Sergio, for your suggestion. I share your belief that Latin diacritics are very important and there are many well deserving cases where they would be necessary and also where the key without diacritics should maybe live together with the version with the diacritics. In a similar way to help IDN variance are handled. Unfortunately with the timing of this work I think it is probably too late for it to be included but ICANN Org staff will try to see if something is possible. We can't commit to anything but we can try. *

--- end of quote -------

and later:

---- start of quote ------------

*CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN: Thank you, Tripti. We go back to the left microphone. *

* SPEAKER: My name is Bill. Why I am a member of the Latin diacritics PDP Working Group, speaking in a individual capacity. This is a continuation of the remarks Sergio made earlier. When the Latin diacritics Working Group was established a year ago, the GNSO gave us a extremely aggressive timeline getting the work done, which we are happily ahead of. But they would not have done that it seems to me if they were fine with the idea that well, we will get around to actually implementing this at some hypothetical future round sometime years down the road. I think they did that because they thought something needed to be done now. In the beginning of the year the Working Group put in a request that the applicant guidebook include a placeholder for our work to be added in and we were assured that it will happen. In the event, it didn't. So sometime soon, maybe even this afternoon, the Board will be asked to sign off on the applicant guidebook. It may be that it will do that, it's maybe that you will decline and send it back for them to get it right. I will just be clear if you say yes, we are proving it, you are sending a message. There are doubtless reasons beyond those that were offered earlier, ICANN internal reasons why things ought to charge forward. Be very clear that outside the ICANN bubble nobody cares about ICANN internal reasons. All they will hear is a message, ICANN does not care about your language and does not care about you. Now you may be comfortable with that or you may feel like this is not the message we are sending, but be clear that is the message that will be received, ICANN does not care. *

* CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN: Thank you for your comment. Alan? *

* ALAN BARRETT: I will try to take this. Thank you very much for your comments. I very much agree that it is important but on the other hand we do have to follow our process. We have not received policy or guidance from the GNSO Council on what to do and maybe the GNSO Council would like to make a request to the Board to put in some kind of placeholder. Personally I would very much welcome that but it has not happened and for now I think our hands are tied. *

* SPEAKER: You have authority, your hands are not tied by anyone but yourselves. Thank you. * * CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN: Thank you and with that. *

---------- end of quote --------------

To me, it reads like ICANN is once again on an autopilot to rubber stamp the Final AG whilst under commercial pressures to do so, and in the process, is ready to commit mistakes that it will regret later. Earlier in the week we had a session hosted by At-Large speaking about the wider implications of ICANN's decisions on a geopolitical level and collectively, Board members appear to be oblivious to such important geopolitical consequences, potentially because they are not being counselled adequately about these issues. This is potentially an ICANN failure caused by the general group think that we so often see in the ICANN commercial space.

The Board AGM meeting later this afternoon is indeed a public rubber stamping of resolutions that have already been agreed in advance by the Board in its pre-AGM meeting.

What could be done?

1. Ask our GNSO Liaison Justine Chew on what she suggest could be done NOW 2. Propose that the ALAC issue a very short Statement to be sent to the Board prior to the AGM that the Board should agree to an amendment to their resolution in recognising the Latin Diacritics issue and naming a placeholder in the final Applicant Guidebook for this.

There have been many instances in ICANN's history when, at the very last minute, some resolution text has been added at the last minute - a "friendly amendment" - to keep the door open to include the results of the Latin Diacritics at a placeholder in the final AG.

3. Failing this - because unfortunately the system sometimes sets us up for failure, the ALAC should work with the Canadian Government GAC + other GAC whose languages are affected by this lack of inclusion of the results of the Latin Diacritics Issue. This is a heavier process and one that does not shine a good light onto ICANN's ability to perform its task - rather the opposite, which is that now the GAC has a major issue with ICANN - just like it had in the final months leading to the last round.

I will address this issue in my CPWG report this afternoon. (taking my co-chair's hat off, though)

This is a time to act fast. Otherwise, why are we meeting face to face for?

Kindest regards,

Olivier (own views)

On 30/10/2025 12:52, lists@christopherwilkinson.eu wrote:

Allow me to react to what we have just heard in the ICANN Public Forum (ICANN84 Dublin.)

A participant speaking on behalf of the working group on Latin Diacritics stated that the Applicant Guide Book for the next gTLD Round would not include Latin Diacritics. The response from the Board was that, absent a recommendation from GNSO, “our hands are tied”!

I recall that the IDN issue has been on ICANN’s table, to my certain knowledge since ICANN03 1999 Santiago. (I was there). It should have been settled by now.

Furthermore, casual inspection of the World’s literature, media and press would confirm that latin diacritics are integral to languages widely used in the Americas, Africa, Europe and elsewhere. One does not have to be a universal linguist to appreciate the social, economic and cultural scale of this issue. Their use in the DNS should have been a no-brainer a long time ago.

*Since ICANN84 has not yet concluded, may I request that this situation be reviewed during the ALAC wrap up this afternoon and addressed again to the IANN Board during the concluding session.*

Thank you for your attention

Christopher Wilkinson (on-line)

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:11, cw--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Good evening:

Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format.

Regards

Christopher

____________________

1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true.

____________________________

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com>

...

wrote:

...

What is this about?

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Indeed. At all times and to this day, there are several layers of communication with others in the ICANN ecosystem. You don't think that ICANN works just by having 3 public meetings per year? :-) Kindest regards, Olivier On 04/11/2025 19:32, Alan Greenberg wrote:

Not only during Olivier's reign...

On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 12:30 PM Carlton Samuels via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Echoing OCL's sentiments!

Big +1 to everyone who participated and took action.

OCL forgot to mention this but I can tell you that when he was Chair of the ALAC, we used a lot of what he called floor diplomacy to our advantage. We would have numerous 'off-schedule' discussions with certain influential GNSO Councillors who shall remain nameless but definitely shared the belief system that forked that approach.

Carlton

============================== /Carlton A Samuels/ /Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/ =============================

On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 at 15:19, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

you will have seen the email exchange on 30 October 2025 - as quoted below.

You will have also heard the robust discussion that took place during the At-Large Leadership Wrap-Up which you can watch on: https://icann84.sched.com/event/29QNg/at-large-leadership-wrap-up

During the wrap-up, the ALAC Chair, Jonathan Zuck, mentioned a short follow-up meeting to take place immediately after the wrap-up and immediately before the ICANN Board AGM Meeting. Shortly after this meeting, as a follow-up action, Jonathan Zuck and Justine Chew, ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council, had a brief meeting with the At-Large Selected Board member Leon Sanchez as well as Board member Alan Barrett, the Shepherd of IDN related work on the ICANN Board.

At the ICANN Board AGM of 30 October 2025 - Vote of Resolution (2025.10.30.12), the ICANN Board adopted this version of the New gTLD Program: 2026 Round Applicant Guidebook <https://newgtldprogram.icann.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-gtld-prog...>

Alan Barrett intervened before the vote, mentioning the Latin Diacritics at 44:53:

"I'd also like to say a few words about Latin Diacritics, if I may. There is an ongoing PDP on dealing with Latin Diacritics. We have not received output from that. It's possible that something may come later and it's my personal hope that we'll be able to incorporate it although it's going to depend a lot on timing. Thanks."

As a result, the At-Large Community now need to work with the LD PDP working group to get their policy recommendations in front of GNSO Council as quickly as possible, for consideration and approval, then sending it to the ICANN Board for inclusion in the current version of the Applicant Guidebook.

The ICANN Board resolution leaves the door open for minor changes:

"The President and CEO, or his designee(s), is authorized to make changes to the Guidebook adopted on this day as necessary, so long as such changes do not alter or affect the Guidebook's principles and core policies that were considered and approved by the Board concerning the next round."

So let's all hope the Latin Diacritics (LD) working group results will be able to complete its work on time.

In the meantime, I would like to thank Sergio Salinas Porto and Christopher Wilkinson for expressing the importance of this issue for their community.

I would like to thank Satish Babu and Bill Jouris for not only raising the importance of this issue at this ICANN meeting, but for their relentless work on the Latin Diacritics PDP. It is firmly thanks to their hard work and that of their colleagues on the LD PDP, that they are progressing faster than expected.

I would also like to thank Justine Chew and Jonathan Zuck, for their fast action, at very short notice, meeting up with Leon Sanchez and Alan Barrett and directly expressing the concerns of our Community with only minutes to spare until the ICANN Board AGM.

It is thanks to this fast action that it is clear and on the record that the door is open for the LD PDP results to be taken into account in this round's Applicant Guidebook.

Policy Advice as undertaken by the ALAC at ICANN is not just the drafting of formal ALAC Advice. It also involves the use of on the floor diplomacy to make sure the end user perspective is shared and promoted where and when it matters most. If I am writing this email, it is because we unfortunately often focus on our failings. Well, today we can focus on a success - perhaps a small success - but nonetheless a success of being able to influence matters that are important to our community.

I hope that this serves as a lesson to everyone that you cannot win a battle if you start by saying it's too late.

It's never too late to do the right thing.

Well done everyone.

Olivier

On 30/10/2025 14:50, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via CPWG wrote:

...

Dear Christopher,

thank you for picking this up. Watching the ICANN84 public forum, I noted the intervention of both:

- Sergio Salina Porto - Bill Jouris

Quoting from the instantaneous transcript:

----- start of quote ---------------

/SPEAKER:  Okay. Thank you. [Laughs] I am going to speak Spanish, please use headphones. I would like to express my concern for the lack of a point in ICANN guidebook for Latin diacritics PDP. This PDP addresses the possibility of end-users to see their languages properly represented in the Domain Name System including the use of diacritics in the Latin. This is not just a technical issue, it affects the way in which communities write the name and identify themselves online. I am not requesting any extension for the Next Round nor changes in the timeline that was already published. The request that I'm making here is particularly that the applicant guidebook includes a clear because that if the Latin diacritics PDP presents recommendations within the time that is already set, the recommendations will be included in the round. I consider this a reasonable adaptation of the community work that has a impact on the cultural and linguistic sphere and aspects and nature of users. I did not introduce myself, my name is -- and I'm the outgoing secretary of --. I am making the statement in my personal capacity and not on behalf of my region, thank you. / / MAARTEN BOTTERMAN: Thank you, Sergio. Who can answer this? / / ALAN BARRETT:  Thank you, Sergio, for your suggestion. I share your belief that Latin diacritics are very important and there are many well deserving cases where they would be necessary and also where the key without diacritics should maybe live together with the version with the diacritics. In a similar way to help IDN variance are handled. Unfortunately with the timing of this work I think it is probably too late for it to be included but ICANN Org staff will try to see if something is possible. We can't commit to anything but we can try. /

--- end of quote -------

and later:

---- start of quote ------------

/CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN:  Thank you, Tripti. We go back to the left microphone. / / SPEAKER:  My name is Bill. Why I am a member of the Latin diacritics PDP Working Group, speaking in a individual capacity. This is a continuation of the remarks Sergio made earlier. When the Latin diacritics Working Group was established a year ago, the GNSO gave us a extremely aggressive timeline getting the work done, which we are happily ahead of. But they would not have done that it seems to me if they were fine with the idea that well, we will get around to actually implementing this at some hypothetical future round sometime years down the road. I think they did that because they thought something needed to be done now. In the beginning of the year the Working Group put in a request that the applicant guidebook include a placeholder for our work to be added in and we were assured that it will happen. In the event, it didn't. So sometime soon, maybe even this afternoon, the Board will be asked to sign off on the applicant guidebook. It may be that it will do that, it's maybe that you will decline and send it back for them to get it right. I will just be clear if you say yes, we are proving it, you are sending a message. There are doubtless reasons beyond those that were offered earlier, ICANN internal reasons why things ought to charge forward. Be very clear that outside the ICANN bubble nobody cares about ICANN internal reasons. All they will hear is a message, ICANN does not care about your language and does not care about you. Now you may be comfortable with that or you may feel like this is not the message we are sending, but be clear that is the message that will be received, ICANN does not care. / / CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN:  Thank you for your comment. Alan? / / ALAN BARRETT:  I will try to take this. Thank you very much for your comments. I very much agree that it is important but on the other hand we do have to follow our process. We have not received policy or guidance from the GNSO Council on what to do and maybe the GNSO Council would like to make a request to the Board to put in some kind of placeholder. Personally I would very much welcome that but it has not happened and for now I think our hands are tied. / / SPEAKER:  You have authority, your hands are not tied by anyone but yourselves. Thank you. / / CHRISTIAN KAUFMANN:  Thank you and with that. /

---------- end of quote --------------

To me, it reads like ICANN is once again on an autopilot to rubber stamp the Final AG whilst under commercial pressures to do so, and in the process, is ready to commit mistakes that it will regret later. Earlier in the week we had a session hosted by At-Large speaking about the wider implications of ICANN's decisions on a geopolitical level and collectively, Board members appear to be oblivious to such important geopolitical consequences, potentially because they are not being counselled adequately about these issues. This is potentially an ICANN failure caused by the general group think that we so often see in the ICANN commercial space.

The Board AGM meeting later this afternoon is indeed a public rubber stamping of resolutions that have already been agreed in advance by the Board in its pre-AGM meeting.

What could be done?

1. Ask our GNSO Liaison Justine Chew on what she suggest could be done NOW 2. Propose that the ALAC issue a very short Statement to be sent to the Board prior to the AGM that the Board should agree to an amendment to their resolution in recognising the Latin Diacritics issue and naming a placeholder in the final Applicant Guidebook for this.

There have been many instances in ICANN's history when, at the very last minute, some resolution text has been added at the last minute - a "friendly amendment" - to keep the door open to include the results of the Latin Diacritics at a placeholder in the final AG.

3. Failing this - because unfortunately the system sometimes sets us up for failure, the ALAC should work with the Canadian Government GAC + other GAC whose languages are affected by this lack of inclusion of the results of the Latin Diacritics Issue. This is a heavier process and one that does not shine a good light onto ICANN's ability to perform its task - rather the opposite, which is that now the GAC has a major issue with ICANN - just like it had in the final months leading to the last round.

I will address this issue in my CPWG report this afternoon. (taking my co-chair's hat off, though)

This is a time to act fast. Otherwise, why are we meeting face to face for?

Kindest regards,

Olivier (own views)

On 30/10/2025 12:52, lists@christopherwilkinson.eu wrote:

...

Allow me to react to what we have just heard in the ICANN Public Forum (ICANN84 Dublin.)

A participant speaking on behalf of the working group on Latin Diacritics stated that the Applicant Guide Book for the next gTLD Round would not include Latin Diacritics. The response from the Board was that, absent a recommendation from GNSO, “our hands are tied”!

I recall that the IDN issue has been on ICANN’s table, to my certain knowledge since ICANN03 1999 Santiago. (I was there). It should have been settled by now.

Furthermore, casual inspection of the World’s literature, media and press would confirm that latin diacritics are integral to languages widely used in the Americas, Africa, Europe and elsewhere. One does not have to be a universal linguist to appreciate the social, economic and cultural scale of this issue. Their use in the DNS should have been a no-brainer a long time ago.

*Since ICANN84 has not yet concluded, may I request that this situation be reviewed during the ALAC wrap up this afternoon and addressed again to the IANN Board during the concluding session.*

* *

Thank you for your attention

Christopher Wilkinson (on-line)

...

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:11, cw--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <mailto:cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Good evening:

Please find attached my comments. I apologise for the rather traditional format.

Regards

Christopher

____________________

...

1. There are several references to GNSO PDPs producing ‘hard-won consensus recommendations by virtue of a bottom-up multi-stakeholder process’, or words to that effect. This does not ring true.

____________________________

...

...

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> <mailto:cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

Thank you again to those who have started providing some input. We welcome and would appreciate more, by way of comments in *this Googledoc* <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_guDm6YehHPwW68jS5JHtUD6RyC0kZJHDXErrEPs...> by Wednesday 22 October 2025, 23:59 UTC as we are hoping to discuss relevant inputs during the CPWG Session at ICANN84.

Please read my email below for details.

Kind regards, Justine * *

On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 at 12:17, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> wrote:

What is this about?

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list --cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email tocpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

Delete and ignore. sent inadvertently CW

On 24 Oct 2025, at 19:12, lists--- via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

...

On 17 Oct 2025, at 09:39, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,