GNSO-TPR Small Team proposal on transfer disputes (Resending with Google form included)
Dear all, The majority of all transfer disputes are settled in a friendly way by the involved registrars. The GNSO-TPR created a Small Team with the task to codify the informal process when there is a dispute of a (inter-registrar) transfer (but a TDRP was not started). At the GNSO-TPR call on May 2, 2023, the chair asked all to get feedback from their stakeholders on whether the Small Team proposal should be “policy” or not. The deadline for feedback was set to Monday May 8, 2023 I have copied the Small Team proposal to a “At-Large” version<https://docs.google.com/document/d/16eXaNTW8pZXQSqZ7ksj-oMc1VPhYAyawNcfDT2CE...> and kindly ask for our view whether this should be “policy” or not. My recommendation is to implement the proposal into the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy, hence tune the wording in to more “policy text”. Please make your comment to https://docs.google.com/document/d/16eXaNTW8pZXQSqZ7ksj-oMc1VPhYAyawNcfDT2CE... and indicate if you are in favor of making this a policy or not. The document includes a Google form for your “vote”. Please answer the form within May 7, 2023 @ 23:59 CET Regards, Steinar Grøtterød At-Large Representative Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (GNSO-TPR PDP)
Dear Steinar, Congratulations for the great proposal! I'm with formalising the actions proposed by the small team in a policy, since such a policy will reduce the dispute period and engage Registrars (specifically losing to contribute) to start minimal actions to effectively resolve matters of dispute. Such a policy will also contribute to the uniformisation of the dispute resolution between registrars. Friendly regards Chokri Le jeu. 4 mai 2023 à 12:54, Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> a écrit :
Dear all,
The majority of all transfer disputes are settled in a friendly way by the involved registrars. The GNSO-TPR created a Small Team with the task to codify the informal process when there is a dispute of a (inter-registrar) transfer (but a TDRP was not started).
At the GNSO-TPR call on May 2, 2023, the chair asked all to get feedback from their stakeholders on whether the Small Team proposal should be “policy” or not. The deadline for feedback was set to Monday May 8, 2023
I have copied the Small Team proposal to a “At-Large” version <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16eXaNTW8pZXQSqZ7ksj-oMc1VPhYAyawNcfDT2CE...> and kindly ask for our view whether this should be “policy” or not.
My recommendation is to implement the proposal into the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy, hence tune the wording in to more “policy text”.
Please make your comment to https://docs.google.com/document/d/16eXaNTW8pZXQSqZ7ksj-oMc1VPhYAyawNcfDT2CE... and indicate if you are in favor of making this a policy or not.
The document includes a Google form for your “vote”. Please answer the form *within May 7, 2023 @ 23:59 CET*
Regards,
Steinar Grøtterød
*At-Large Representative* Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (GNSO-TPR PDP)
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Chokri Ben Romdhane -
Steinar Grøtterød