Re: [CPWG] [registration-issues-wg] [GTLD-WG] Urgent EPDP question
Greg did not say that ALL 3rd part access benefits users. He said that all users benefit from (some) 3rd party access (A implies B does is not cummutative!). Those who fight spam, malware, phishing and develop reputation services use WHOIS, and that help virtually all users (except those doing the naughty things). Alan At 15/10/2018 02:31 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hmm... third party access does not always benefit the end user in reality.
Cheers!
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 19:15 Greg Shatan, <<mailto:greg@isoc-ny.org>greg@isoc-ny.org> wrote: I think the proper question to ask is âHow many end users actually benefited from third parties checking WHOIS dataâ?
The answer might well be âAll of them.â
Best regards,
Greg On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:47 AM Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: Michele you are correct. I considered putting that level of detail in, but decided that it overly complicated a message that was solely asking about legal vs natural persons. Note that your comment would have made the parenthetical twice as long as the rest of the sentence.
Alan
At 15/10/2018 05:15 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Alan
GDPR requires the information related to Natural Persons be protected (for those resident in Europe) be protected. GDPR does not apply to Legal Persons (ie companies).
That isn't what GDPR states. By presenting it as applying to "natural persons" vs "legal persons" you are over simplifying GDPR and its application. GDPR applies to personal data. It applies to data subjects. It also applies to data processing in the EU regardless of where the data subject is. So as an Irish company we have to treat our Canadian clients' data under GDPR as we are processing it in the EU.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains <https://www.blacknight.com/>https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: <https://michele.blog/>https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: <https://ceo.hosting/>https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list <mailto:CPWG@icann.org>CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ GTLD-WG mailing list <mailto:GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org>GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
Working Group direct URL: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list <mailto:CPWG@icann.org>CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ registration-issues-wg mailing list <mailto:registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org>registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
Hello Alan, Do note that my response to Greg's comment does not remove my support for differentiation(just incase you've not counted the +1). That said am clear about what Greg said and I know what I said; the fact that you put an exception your own comment makes the point. Thanks Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 19:56 Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Greg did not say that ALL 3rd part access benefits users. He said that all users benefit from (some) 3rd party access (A implies B does is not cummutative!).
Those who fight spam, malware, phishing and develop reputation services use WHOIS, and that help virtually all users (except those doing the naughty things).
Alan
At 15/10/2018 02:31 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hmm... third party access does not always benefit the end user in reality.
Cheers!
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 19:15 Greg Shatan, <greg@isoc-ny.org> wrote: I think the proper question to ask is “How many end users actually benefited from third parties checking WHOIS data†?
The answer might well be “All of them.â€
Best regards,
Greg On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:47 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca
wrote: Michele you are correct. I considered putting that level of detail in, but decided that it overly complicated a message that was solely asking about legal vs natural persons. Note that your comment would have made the parenthetical twice as long as the rest of the sentence.
Alan
At 15/10/2018 05:15 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Alan
GDPR requires the information related to Natural Persons be protected (for those resident in Europe) be protected. GDPR does not apply to Legal Persons (ie companies).
That isn't what GDPR states. By presenting it as applying to "natural persons" vs "legal persons" you are over simplifying GDPR and its application. GDPR applies to personal data. It applies to data subjects. It also applies to data processing in the EU regardless of where the data subject is. So as an Irish company we have to treat our Canadian clients' data under GDPR as we are processing it in the EU.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ GTLD-WG mailing list GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ registration-issues-wg mailing list registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
I think Alan’s point (and I’ll reiterate it) is that your statement does not impact or limit my statement in any way. Importantly, my statement did not imply the opposite of your statement. So my point stands.... On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:27 PM Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Alan,
Do note that my response to Greg's comment does not remove my support for differentiation(just incase you've not counted the +1).
That said am clear about what Greg said and I know what I said; the fact that you put an exception your own comment makes the point.
Thanks Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 19:56 Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Greg did not say that ALL 3rd part access benefits users. He said that all users benefit from (some) 3rd party access (A implies B does is not cummutative!).
Those who fight spam, malware, phishing and develop reputation services use WHOIS, and that help virtually all users (except those doing the naughty things).
Alan
At 15/10/2018 02:31 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hmm... third party access does not always benefit the end user in reality.
Cheers!
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 19:15 Greg Shatan, <greg@isoc-ny.org> wrote: I think the proper question to ask is “How many end users actually benefited from third parties checking WHOIS data†?
The answer might well be “All of them.â€
Best regards,
Greg
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:47 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca
wrote:
Michele you are correct. I considered putting that level of detail in, but decided that it overly complicated a message that was solely asking about legal vs natural persons. Note that your comment would have made the parenthetical twice as long as the rest of the sentence.
Alan
At 15/10/2018 05:15 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Alan
GDPR requires the information related to Natural Persons be protected (for those resident in Europe) be protected. GDPR does not apply to Legal Persons (ie companies).
That isn't what GDPR states. By presenting it as applying to "natural persons" vs "legal persons" you are over simplifying GDPR and its application. GDPR applies to personal data. It applies to data subjects. It also applies to data processing in the EU regardless of where the data subject is. So as an Irish company we have to treat our Canadian clients' data under GDPR as we are processing it in the EU.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/
https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845

_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ GTLD-WG mailing list GTLD-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg
Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ registration-issues-wg mailing list registration-issues-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
participants (3)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Greg Shatan -
Seun Ojedeji