More interests "announced" to applying for New gTLDs in the Next Round
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la... Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN’s hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year". *_____________________________________________________* *Justine Chew* At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------
Their press release is rather odd, to put it mildly -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours. From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Date: Friday, 7 June 2024 at 05:25 To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] More interests "announced" to applying for New gTLDs in the Next Round [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources. https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la... Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN’s hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year". _____________________________________________________ Justine Chew At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------
Hi, well 2-3 years till it starts and another 2-3 years for names to be delegated? just guessing a hand wave of 6 years is a good wide estimate for a proposal. That way when it hasn't happened in 4-5 years as many would like, the money does not get nervous. I still wonder how the whole contention resolution will work with such widely advertised intentions. Will it be able to ignore it as if nothing had been said? Will that be considered legitimate? How will that affect the timelines for those applications. While there are those who have raised the warning flag of this onrushing train for a few years now, I think we have pretty much figured everything will be fine. Like I said, I wonder. avri On 2024-06-07 00:24, Justine Chew via CPWG wrote:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la...
Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN's hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year".
_____________________________________________________ Justine Chew At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ [1]
------ _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Links: ------ [1] https://atlarge.icann.org/
Avri's point on how these 'announces' will effect future contention set resolutions, is something I'm interested in pondering I must say... On Sat, 8 June 2024, 05:30 avri--- via CPWG, <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Hi,
well 2-3 years till it starts and another 2-3 years for names to be delegated? just guessing a hand wave of 6 years is a good wide estimate for a proposal. That way when it hasn't happened in 4-5 years as many would like, the money does not get nervous.
I still wonder how the whole contention resolution will work with such widely advertised intentions. Will it be able to ignore it as if nothing had been said? Will that be considered legitimate? How will that affect the timelines for those applications.
While there are those who have raised the warning flag of this onrushing train for a few years now, I think we have pretty much figured everything will be fine.
Like I said, I wonder.
avri
On 2024-06-07 00:24, Justine Chew via CPWG wrote:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la...
Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN's hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year".
*_____________________________________________________* *Justine Chew* At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I see it as an advertisement to ICANN. But 6 years looks like a long way to go. Hadia Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Jun 2024, at 1:39 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Avri's point on how these 'announces' will effect future contention set resolutions, is something I'm interested in pondering I must say...
On Sat, 8 June 2024, 05:30 avri--- via CPWG, <cpwg@icann.org> wrote: Hi,
well 2-3 years till it starts and another 2-3 years for names to be delegated? just guessing a hand wave of 6 years is a good wide estimate for a proposal. That way when it hasn't happened in 4-5 years as many would like, the money does not get nervous.
I still wonder how the whole contention resolution will work with such widely advertised intentions. Will it be able to ignore it as if nothing had been said? Will that be considered legitimate? How will that affect the timelines for those applications.
While there are those who have raised the warning flag of this onrushing train for a few years now, I think we have pretty much figured everything will be fine.
Like I said, I wonder.
avri
On 2024-06-07 00:24, Justine Chew via CPWG wrote:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la...
Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN's hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year".
_____________________________________________________ Justine Chew At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
At least, because they have "announced" so early, we have some time to figure out what out policy ought to be. Bill Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 3:39 AM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr via CPWG<cpwg@icann.org> wrote: _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I'll be surprised if they are the only applicant for .blockchain.... On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 12:25 AM Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la...
Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN’s hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year".
*_____________________________________________________* *Justine Chew* At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------ _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Um well, the timeline suggests these fellas are looking a ways down the road. If one expects competitors and assuming the principals are sentient, whyever would this declaration now make sense? In another area of practice of some familiarity, they call this action 'creating facts on the ground with verifiable spoor markings'. Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 at 23:25, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la...
Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN’s hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year".
*_____________________________________________________* *Justine Chew* At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------ _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hello All, I am rather bullish on the future of AI/ML, however, I think it is prudent to be mindful of its current limitations. I recently participated in a conference where the host offered the ability to have AI summarize the presentation. The panelists for a session I was moderating opted not to use this feature because of the highly legal and regulatory nature of the session. Having looked at the AI summarizes from other sessions, I think that this was a good session. I was reminded of this fact today. While listening to the Next gTLD round zoom session, I was concurrently reading the transcription from the GAC opening session. I did a double take when I saw the GNSO was responsible for the slaughter of over 1 million Tutsi in 1994. (see below) [cid:image001.png@01DABAF0.B6E92120] I believe that ICANN Org does not generally edits its transcripts, however, I would hope that they could make an exception out of respect for those Tusti and other minority ethnic groups that lost their lives. I would not want a future LLM using this ICANN transcript to promote false and inaccurate information. As future LLM models continue to scrape the internet for as much knowledge as possible, we must never forget the old adage Garbage In Garbage Out. Best regards, Michael
Thank you Michael Palage. Your concern is well appreciated. SUGGESTION: Instead of taking a case - by - case approach, is there a ICANN Standard Disclaimer that reads something like: No automated translation / text generation / recording / abstracting is perfect nor is it intended to replace human. They are provided as a service to users and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of such services in any language. There are limitations to these automated services. For any clarifications the participation manager of the specific meeting may be contacted. Hope this is within the ICANN Remit. Sincerely, Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ________________________________ From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of mike palage.com via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Sent: 10 June 2024 14:19 To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org>; John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@icann.org>; tripti.sinha@board.icann.org <tripti.sinha@board.icann.org> Subject: [CPWG] AI/ML Limitations - ICANN80 reminder Hello All, I am rather bullish on the future of AI/ML, however, I think it is prudent to be mindful of its current limitations. I recently participated in a conference where the host offered the ability to have AI summarize the presentation. The panelists for a session I was moderating opted not to use this feature because of the highly legal and regulatory nature of the session. Having looked at the AI summarizes from other sessions, I think that this was a good session. I was reminded of this fact today. While listening to the Next gTLD round zoom session, I was concurrently reading the transcription from the GAC opening session. I did a double take when I saw the GNSO was responsible for the slaughter of over 1 million Tutsi in 1994. (see below) [cid:image001.png@01DABAF0.B6E92120] I believe that ICANN Org does not generally edits its transcripts, however, I would hope that they could make an exception out of respect for those Tusti and other minority ethnic groups that lost their lives. I would not want a future LLM using this ICANN transcript to promote false and inaccurate information. As future LLM models continue to scrape the internet for as much knowledge as possible, we must never forget the old adage Garbage In Garbage Out. Best regards, Michael
Gopal, I agree that a standard disclaimer would be sufficient in most cases. However, given the national tragedy which was cited multiple times in yesterday's meetings, I think this is something that needs to be proactively addressed. Best regards, Michael From: gopal <gopal@annauniv.edu> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 5:42 AM To: mike palage.com <mike@palage.com>; CPWG CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: AI/ML Limitations - ICANN80 reminder Thank you Michael Palage. Your concern is well appreciated. SUGGESTION: Instead of taking a case - by - case approach, is there a ICANN Standard Disclaimer that reads something like: No automated translation / text generation / recording / abstracting is perfect nor is it intended to replace human. They are provided as a service to users and are provided "as is." No warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability, or correctness of such services in any language. There are limitations to these automated services. For any clarifications the participation manager of the specific meeting may be contacted. Hope this is within the ICANN Remit. Sincerely, Gopal T V 0 9840121302 https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545 https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. T V Gopal Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering Anna University Chennai - 600 025, INDIA Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340 (Res) 24454753 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ________________________________ From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:cpwg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of mike palage.com via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org<mailto:cpwg@icann.org>> Sent: 10 June 2024 14:19 To: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org<mailto:cpwg@icann.org>>; John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@icann.org<mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org>>; tripti.sinha@board.icann.org<mailto:tripti.sinha@board.icann.org> <tripti.sinha@board.icann.org<mailto:tripti.sinha@board.icann.org>> Subject: [CPWG] AI/ML Limitations - ICANN80 reminder Hello All, I am rather bullish on the future of AI/ML, however, I think it is prudent to be mindful of its current limitations. I recently participated in a conference where the host offered the ability to have AI summarize the presentation. The panelists for a session I was moderating opted not to use this feature because of the highly legal and regulatory nature of the session. Having looked at the AI summarizes from other sessions, I think that this was a good session. I was reminded of this fact today. While listening to the Next gTLD round zoom session, I was concurrently reading the transcription from the GAC opening session. I did a double take when I saw the GNSO was responsible for the slaughter of over 1 million Tutsi in 1994. (see below) [cid:image001.png@01DABAF9.911ED170] I believe that ICANN Org does not generally edits its transcripts, however, I would hope that they could make an exception out of respect for those Tusti and other minority ethnic groups that lost their lives. I would not want a future LLM using this ICANN transcript to promote false and inaccurate information. As future LLM models continue to scrape the internet for as much knowledge as possible, we must never forget the old adage Garbage In Garbage Out. Best regards, Michael
Hi all, " *Over the years, Blockchain.com onboarded 40 million verified users, created over 90 million crypto wallets and supported $1.2 trillion in crypto transactions*." If those data are trustable imagine the current Impact on the DNS market(Unstoppable Domains is a for-profit company)! no need to wait for the next gtld round! Chokri Le ven. 7 juin 2024 à 05:25, Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> a écrit :
https://cointelegraph.com/news/unstoppable-domains-blockchain-web3-domain-la...
Save, that I do not know where Unstoppable Domains and Blockchain.com got the notion of "ICANN’s hotly anticipated six-year registration program next year".
*_____________________________________________________* *Justine Chew* At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) Liaison to the GNSO Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) At-Large website: https://atlarge.icann.org/ ------ _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (11)
-
avri＠doria.org -
Bill Jouris -
Carlton Samuels -
Cheryl Langdon-Orr -
Chokri Ben Romdhane -
gopal -
Greg Shatan -
Hadia El Miniawi -
Justine Chew -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight -
mike palage.com