Hi Maria My only comment was around whether we needed the metric around the liaisons as there isn’t a formal measure as such for them. I was wondering if we added the comment about them to the one about the members. Something like ‘it was noted that while there had been no issues with the attendance of members it had been noted that not all liaisons attended regularly.’ So essentially similar wording to what you had but as part of what is something that should be measured. Cheers Debbie
On 27/11/2018, at 04:25, Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org> wrote:
Hello all,
In prep for Wednesday’s Effectiveness Review Team call, could you please provide any comments on the matrix if you have any?
Thanks, Ria
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Maria Otanes <maria.otanes@icann.org <mailto:maria.otanes@icann.org>> Date: Monday, November 19, 2018 at 3:18 PM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] FW: Notes, updated version Schedule and Assessment Matrix
Dear all,
Friendly reminder, please complete the Doodle poll if you haven’t done so already.
https://doodle.com/poll/xsm3gp23fwigprqe <https://doodle.com/poll/xsm3gp23fwigprqe>
Please also let us know if you have any comments on the consolidated matrix attached.
Thanks, Ria
From: CSC-EffectivenessRT <csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org <mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 11:05 AM To: "csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>" <csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org <mailto:csc-effectivenessrt@icann.org>> Subject: [CSC-EffectivenessRT] Notes, updated version Schedule and Assessment Matrix
Dear all, Please find included: the notes from yesterday’s call. the updated schedule ( includes a public comment period ending 8 February), and submission of final report by 25 February. There is a little slack ( explained in text) of 2 weeks, however note the Final report needs to be submitted by the Councils. Updated version Assessment matrix. The changes have been highlighted in yellow
Staff will send out a Doodle poll for a call on Wednesday 29 November ( 18.00 or 19.00 UTC).
Please look at the updated Assessment Matrix and provide additional comments on-line over the next week. Please also provide comments/ feed-back on proposed outline for report (see below)
Draft Outline Report Executive Summary Introduction and reading guide To include reference to need for review and potential overlap with IFRT and Template for the review as adopted by ccNSO and GNSO Method of review ( refer to section in template) Reference to Final Report CSC Charter review. This review builds on main (undisputed conclusions and findings) of the Charter review team. Introduce Assessment matrix i.e assessment of effectiveness of CSC by reference to activities listed in the charter. Findings within scope Assessment matrix Findings, if any outside of scope of this review Recommendations Description of process Annex A: template for review as adopted Annex B: Members RT and liaisons
Kind regards, Bart
<Update CSC Effectiveness Assessment_Matrix-15 November 2018.docx><Update Review Schedule version 2.docx><Informal Notes CSC 14 November 2018.docx>_______________________________________________ CSC-EffectivenessRT mailing list CSC-EffectivenessRT@icann.org <mailto:CSC-EffectivenessRT@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-effectivenessrt <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/csc-effectivenessrt>