On 28/11/2014 07:38, Sivasubramanian M wrote:
One problem with this approach is that some of such imaginary extreme scenarios vividly outline ways by which IANA can be harmed, and might give ideas that might actually lead to such scenarios.
The post-transition environment we are attempting to design is intended to be permanent. I don't think it would be sensible to close our eyes to potential risks on the grounds that "they might give people ideas" for how to cause harm. Sooner or later, someone is likely to come up with those same ideas anyway. Even recognising our limited, imperfect nature, we should still at least aim for any permanent outcome we design to be proof against any harmful ideas we can imagine. I therefore regard these stress tests as a valuable contribution to a discussion of success criteria for any post-NTIA structure. Malcolm. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA