Hi, The issue is that the IRP can only act on the basis of a bylaw being infringed. So either we need a bylaw that covers all the conditions on which an appeal would be made, or an IRP that specifically made provision for IANA performance issues. We could also require a stand alone process that was separate from the IRP. avri On 22-Jan-16 07:33, Jonathan Robinson wrote:
So the essential question is:
A. Is an ICANN bylaw provision that allows for an IRP if ICANN fails to enforce the contract with PTI (for example, due to a material performance breach by PTI that is not cured) sufficient?
OR
B. In addition to such an ICANN bylaw, is a separate process also required that would give direct customers a right to mediation or arbitration to address SLAs or other service issues?
If B above, what type of process is necessary?
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus