Sept. 30, 2015
11:55 a.m.
Alan Greenberg writes:
Regarding the first item on the Verisign/ICANN proposal:
To quote from an analysis I did for the ALAC Transition Support group:
The document is an implementation of the implied recommendation of Design Team F that nothing be changed in the RZMS code prior to or during transition. It follows the golden rule that you should make as few changes at the same time as possible.
In my mind, this proposal carried that rule to a ridiculous extreme.
The proposal calls for an lot of work and expense to avoid making a relatively simple coding change that could be verified seventeen ways to Sunday. But yes, it does meeting the CWG requirements.
Agreed, it is just a proposal for testing the communication lines. jaap