Presumably if ICANN has an obligation in its Bylaws to ensure that PTI does the right thing, it will need to create the necessary enforcement mechanisms in its relationship with PTI. J. Beckwith Burr Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006 Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz> On 1/25/16, 10:30 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
Another nagging question I have, and one I think people tell me I am wrong about becase of MOUs and contracts.
In the PTI environment, given that ICANN remains the representative for 2 of the operational communities, and they resolve their IANA issues with ICANN based on contracts and MOUs, how do we expect ICANN to get what it needs from IANA on their behalf?
Will, as today. they just tell IANA what to do and that will be the end of it.
The other OCs have indicated that any appeals mechanisms we create are irrelevant to their case - they have their own methods. But these methods involve ICANN and not PTI. Does ICANN need to appeal on their behalf? How does it do this?
avri
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_antivir us&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8 WDDkMr4k&m=sNRRTgQciMa9L6cxsRmapxpj1FEfitYPlAMn4NmB4Gk&s=VjHS6O9uycnwTVSFP XRCBB11R2TBkKIwjKy1wEj8MaU&e=
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_ listinfo_cwg-2Dstewardship&d=CwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6 X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=sNRRTgQciMa9L6cxsRmapxpj1FEfitYPlAMn4Nm B4Gk&s=0HwgSD_DtHwhuq9QOacLroSh0USPJ_sMNZMCTVHGh78&e=