Hi, Do we have any idea of what the .int 2nd level registrants want? Do we care? avri On 17-May-15 19:30, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On May 17, 2015, at 19:19, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 04:20:57PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote: It _is_ "broken" to have the root zone file editor running a TLD, especially one that connects it to intergovernmental organizations. Why? That is the state of affairs prior to transition. Why is it a bad thing afterwards? Because it was an equally bad thing before, but equally not in need of urgent fixing?
-Bill
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com