Andrew, I submitted a question to be asked of Sidley before the deadline ending basically asking if there were any legal issues related to this type of scenario. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 7:20 PM To: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Question for Sidley Dear colleagues, On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:14:31PM +0000, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
2) implement it with the clear understanding that we would switch to the legal separation approach in a specified time period (e.g., 12-18 months). The latter approach would allow plenty of time to do it right while still facilitating a quicker transition.
This is a fetching idea. What would it take to institute the binding legal regime that would allow us to do the internal model for some defined period and then, if need be, force a new model? I know this is a little late compared to the desired deadlines, but would it be possible to ask Sidley about this as well? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship