Seun, Thanks. It will be great if we do get so far in Istanbul as to not need any supplementary time together as a group. That said, if we stick with the schedule we are working to, it seems wise to plan for it as a contingency. Jonathan From: Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com] Sent: 16 March 2015 17:48 To: Grace Abuhamad Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Proposed Agenda for 3/17 call Thanks for the share Grace, item no 5 of the agenda gives me serious concern; if we cannot take advantage of our face 2 face and ensure high intensity discussion to produce highly productive outcome. I personally doubt the remote based meeting will achieve more, especially considering most will just be settling down from the face 2 face. Unless we want to produce an outcome that is largely evident of views motivated beyond voluntary. I hope the Co-chairs will take this seriously. I am raising this just incase I am unable to join in tomorrow's call as I like it to be on record. Regards sent from Google nexus 4 kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 16 Mar 2015 17:43, "Grace Abuhamad" <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> wrote: Dear all, Please see below the proposed agenda for the call on 17 March at 17:00 UTC. Proposed Agenda 17/3: 1. Opening Remarks 2. Proposal 2.2 3. Design Teams a. Istanbul cut-off on Monday 18:00 UTC b. Update on DT-A (Paul Kane) c. Update on DT-B (Allan MacGillivray) d. Update on DT-C (Donna Austin) e. Status of additional DTs (DT-D; DT-F; DT-L; DT-M; Red team; DT-N) 4. Update from Client Committee 5. AOB a. High Intensity 1-2 April 6. Closing Remarks Outstanding Actions: Action (Robert & Cheryl): suggest text to fill out sections 4 and 5 of proposal (Wiki will serve as basis) Action (Avri): Review the work of the CWG and the communications between CCWG/CWG to ensure that the interdependencies are up to date are they outdated?) _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship