I agree with Wolf-Ulrich on the "separability should persist." The perpetual nature of this bothered me as well. (I agree on the other two points, too, but I dealt with them in my revised draft, I believe.) Greg *Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab* *666 Third Avenue **ï** New York, NY 10017-5621* *Direct* 212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022 *Fax* 212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428 *gsshatan@lawabel.com <gsshatan@lawabel.com>* *ICANN-related: gregshatanipc@gmail.com <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> * *www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>* On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:14 AM, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
I agree to Chuck’s edits:
- f.vi. should be deleted. I can’t recognize a difference in value compared to the chapeau text.
- h.: My concern is with the last sentence “separability should persist...”) since it claims for an eternal fixing which I never would dare to implement. It should be deleted in my opinion.
- g. (Multistakehoder principle): numbering should be “i.”. I also concur with Milton. Isn’t here “governance” more appropriate than “management”?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
*From:* Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 10:18 PM *To:* Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr@difo.dk> ; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
I made a couple more edits in item g at the end of the document.
Chuck
*From:* Gomes, Chuck *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 4:12 PM *To:* 'Lise Fuhr'; cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
I made a couple edits and suggested a third in my next to last comment. I also identified in my comments some possible action items that the CWG may need to perform as soon as possible assuming that the principles are adopted by the CWG.
Chuck
*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:34 AM *To:* cwg-stewardship@icann.org *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
Dear All,
We hereby send you a redline and a clean version of the Principles document. For the unresolved part, staff has done a table. We recommend that we focus on the outstanding issues, that are identified in the comments. We welcome any inputs on either the comments or on the redline draft. The document will be finalized on the next call.
Best regards,
Martin and Lise
------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship