Jonathan/Lise, You are probably ahead of me but, if there is time in our CWG call this week, it might be a good idea to discuss Kavouss's comments. Allowing the 'experts' to respond to his comments and other CWG members to discuss as well might help although I am not sure he will easily concede. It would at least document the discussion in a very visible way. I of course will respect your decision on how to handle this. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Arasteh Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 12:46 PM To: Jari Arkko Cc: cwg-stewardship@icann.org Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016 Dear Jari I have made many comments during public comment period for CCWG. Non of them were consulted??? Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Aug 2016, at 18:44, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
That does not mean that my comments be ignored
No, of course not. What I said was that we have more time to consider additional comments during the public comment period.
Jari
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship