Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Bylaws Review Meeting on 11 April will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/RieAAw A copy of the notes and action items may be found below. Kind regards, Brenda Action Items Action (Sharon): Reach out to Avri and Matt with Client Committee in copy about language in 18.4a. Action (Chairs): Due to time constraints on this call, Chairs will discuss and revert back to group with next steps. Notes 1. Review of CWG-Stewardship responses on Bylaws (lead by DT leads for each section) * Question 8: response approved with "direct customers" * Question 9: change to reflect confirmation of the question: CSC liaison is intended to come from RrSG or NCSG. Only restriction is that this not be from a gTLD registry. * Question 10: no change. * Question 11: the "it may be appropriate" section can be placed in the Charter. It is not for inclusion in Bylaws. * Question 12: no change. * Question 13: We can keep the clarification and refer to the original text as inclusive of the broader community of 'consumers'. Or an alternative: direct customers of the naming services" (text used for CSC). That text is as follows: "Any necessary additions to the IANA SOW to account for the needs of the consumers of the IANA naming functions [and/or] the ICANN community at large". * Question 14: no change. * Question 15: no change. * Question 16: Suggest going back to original CWG proposal language ("reasonable consultation with SOs and ACs") * Question 17: clarification on the definition of performance. * Question 18: no change * Question 19: no change * Question 20: Suggestion for "as many individuals be appointed as possible". Agreement no to specify any numbers. * Question 21: no change * Question 22: no support for defining a simple majority. There is support for use of consensus. The CWG-Stewardship proposal states that the SCWG would follow the stndards established by the CCWG-Principles. * Question 24: no change * Other comments: Sharon has one question regaring 18.4a. Will reach out to Avri and Matt to clarify. * Paul Kane noted concerns with consistency in Bylaws language and focus on gTLDs. Action (Sharon): Reach out to Avri and Matt with Client Committee in copy about language in 18.4a. 2. AOB Next meeting (Thursday 14 April at 16:00 UTC). Group may not need a meeting on Thursday. The implementation update and other items may be able to be provided via email. Action (Chairs): Due to time constraints on this call, Chairs will discuss and revert back to group with next steps.
