March 2, 2015
10:08 a.m.
David Conrad writes:
<SNIP>
Just to be clear, my understanding was that the Design Team proposed by Paul Kane was going to focus on service level expectations of existing services, not identifying what needs to be done operationally to transition to a post-NTIA world.
That has been my understanding as well. During that stock taking, there might ne identification of things needed to be changed because NTIA falls out the (operational) loop. Observation: I see about 20 messages speculating about a possible undesirable outcome. Discussiong the outcome while the DT hasn't been formed nor started seems premature to me. In the end this group can always throw away the proposals whether it is from an "official" DT or not. jaap