As mentioned in my prior email, there are two points where CWG input is required: 1. Entity entering into Community Agreement as the "Names Community." There's been some discussion of this point between Seun and myself, but that's it so far. Without recapping the discussion, the viable candidates identified so far are ICANN and the Empowered Community. We don't need to decide this point this week, but we need it done well before the agreement is going to be signed. 2. Description of IANA Naming Services. Josh suggested that the descriptive language used in the Naming Functions Agreement could be modified for use here. Any comments on that point? Also, a third point occurs to me, which needs to be dealt with before the agreement is signed: We need to figure out how the 3 "names community" representatives to the CCG will be selected. Greg