Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer@icann.org> wrote:
Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make decisions based on their approval.
ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a letter of appointment of CCG reps.
SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case, I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency. On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members. Regards
5. AOB
IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
_______________________________________________ CWG-Stewardship mailing list CWG-Stewardship@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship